Usually even Nintendo console gets a prior Gen remake and they’re up to Gen 5, and that doesn’t appear on the list unless that’s what Codename Seed ultimately is. That might fit if its prior regions any if its more than one then maybe that a more interesting twist on it to buck the trend.

The Gen 5 Remake does seem to be a Switch 2 exclusive given the alleged timing. Don't know if we'll ever get 2 standard remakes in a console generation. Let's Go was a remake of Gen 1, but not the way most remakes have been.

Gen 6 probably won't get a remake on Switch 2 unless it's cross-gen with the Switch 2's successor or comes out shortly before it launches. 

I assume they are referring to Nintendo's internal studios, EPD, as opposed to Gamefreak which are an independent developer.

Gamefreak is not owned by Nintendo. They are a separate company from Nintendo. 

Im well aware. There is no ‘proper’ though.

I imagine gameplay-wise it's at least decent. Dropped to 79 on meta now.

I think it's saving grace is probably that it's basically a switch 1 game and it's being reviewed on switch 2. So it should at least have good performance even if it looks bad and is technically inept. If it wasn't for the switch 2's extra horsepower the score may have been right down there in the low 70's with S/V. Though maybe it runs fine on switch 1, no idea cause there's no reviews of it.

I'm sure I'll at least give it a go someday.

The leak revealing that the entire Z-A city is a single model, so can't be culled, made zero sense to me on how that even be rendered on the Switch. Until I realised that the entire city has less vertices than two cars in Forza.

The City has 355k vertices, Forza cars during races have between 100k and 250k, and in ForzaVista can have up to 800k.

How is it so low? Probably because the building models are completely flat, and things like windows and balconies are just flat plastered textures. They have basically the same model complexity as GTA3.

I've never seen such lazy game dev lmao. 

This is misinformation that's been debunked.

The model shown here is used for a zoomed out view, not actual gameplay.

I see, that does make more sense. I do wonder how the model complexity compares.

Edit: Though I would like a source for this, as I'm seeing other people dispute this debunk and that it is in-fact used in game, as it was in the leaked development build. Though even if it is one large model vertices can actually be culled when not in view.

I'm very sorry for the YouTube video being as...um...the way that it is. However, it communicates the evidence. Additionally, @/ElChicoEevee on X (linked above) has done research on this question, and has confirmed that in fact this model is not the one which players roam around during gameplay.