By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Conservative activist Charlie Kirk murdered in Utah

curl-6 said:

FBI Director Kash Patel has stated on Twitter that they have a suspect in custody:

https://x.com/FBIDirectorKash/status/1965903392934633587

Nope, the FBI Director just doesn't understand the difference between suspect and person of interest.

Clowns from the top down running this administration.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 10 September 2025

Around the Network
angrypoolman said:
Chris Hu said:

Well, people that spew hateful comments like Charlie Kirk did should get dehumanized by most people that are logical thinkers.

you call it logic to strip somebody's humanity because you dont like the things they say or stand for. in case you dont know, at least half of americans believe in and or agree with a lot of what he says. so in your view, over half of america is not human. is this logic or is this just emotional rambling?

Way less than half the people believed any of the BS he was spewing.  Plus, the US has more people that vote against their own self-interests than any other country in the world.  Plus, there are ton of grifters on the right that do not even believe most of the BS they are spewing out of their mouth they just doing it to make some easy money.



Chris Hu said:
angrypoolman said:

you call it logic to strip somebody's humanity because you dont like the things they say or stand for. in case you dont know, at least half of americans believe in and or agree with a lot of what he says. so in your view, over half of america is not human. is this logic or is this just emotional rambling?

Way less than half the people believed any of the BS he was spewing.  Plus, the US has more people that vote against their own self-interests than any other country in the world.  Plus, there are ton of grifters on the right that do not even believe most of the BS they are spewing out of their mouth they just doing it to make some easy money.

im obviously not saying that over half of america believed 100% every single thing he has ever said. what im saying is that over half of america believed in things that people like you would say he should die for believing.



RIP Charlie



Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

angrypoolman said:
Chris Hu said:

Well, people that spew hateful comments like Charlie Kirk did should get dehumanized by most people that are logical thinkers.

you call it logic to strip somebody's humanity because you dont like the things they say or stand for. in case you dont know, at least half of americans believe in and or agree with a lot of what he says. so in your view, over half of america is not human. is this logic or is this just emotional rambling?

Now now, you're using a bad appeal to popularity rethoric. Half of those who actually voted in the last election might've only agreed on who was going to sit in that Oval space. Said voters do not represent half the population of the US funnily enough.

And there's no way of telling how many agrees with said beliefs especially when voting factors can go beyond them. 

Anyway, the man in question ripped what he sowed, end of debate.



Switch Friend Code : 3905-6122-2909 

Around the Network
Mar1217 said:
angrypoolman said:

you call it logic to strip somebody's humanity because you dont like the things they say or stand for. in case you dont know, at least half of americans believe in and or agree with a lot of what he says. so in your view, over half of america is not human. is this logic or is this just emotional rambling?

Now now, you're using a bad appeal to popularity rethoric. Half of those who actually voted in the last election might've only agreed on who was going to sit in that Oval space. Said voters do not represent half the population of the US funnily enough.

And there's no way of telling how many agrees with said beliefs especially when voting factors can go beyond them. 

Anyway, the man in question ripped what he sowed, end of debate.

the views he had that you and others think he should die for are not that wild and controversial to the average american.





Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

angrypoolman said:
Mar1217 said:

Now now, you're using a bad appeal to popularity rethoric. Half of those who actually voted in the last election might've only agreed on who was going to sit in that Oval space. Said voters do not represent half the population of the US funnily enough.

And there's no way of telling how many agrees with said beliefs especially when voting factors can go beyond them. 

Anyway, the man in question ripped what he sowed, end of debate.

the views he had that you and others think he should die for are not that wild and controversial to the average american.

And that's exactly why I thank the good star that I ain't American really. 

Nonetheless, the end result is horrific and just plain sad, no matter the side of the debate you're on. 



Switch Friend Code : 3905-6122-2909 

KLXVER said:

People are very fast to dehuminize people they dont agree with these days. Its very scary. 

I mean, yes, that's what Kirk was doing.

A reminder that to him, empathy didn't exist, and also that children should watch public executions, and that public shootings are a fair price to pay for the 2nd amendment.

So much of his vile rhetoric resonates with his death that it's ironic.



 

 

 

 

 

angrypoolman said:

he isnt to blame for his death in any way. are you really going to sit here and tell me and everybody else that anybody who defends the second amendment is to blame for their own death? this is an asinine position. gun control laws are not going to prevent straight up assassinations like this. the reason this occurred is because there was somebody out there who didnt like what he was saying, so he or somebody else decided that they wanted him dead. its as simple as that. this is a problem of how radicalized people are when it comes to the way they react to opposing worldviews. thats what this is 100% about.

i agree with your point on the left vs right toxicity in our country and how extreme people have become. also keeping the incident in charlotte north carolina in mind, we need the second amendment now more than ever. its becoming increasingly clear that you are safest, especially in urban areas, when you are strapped. everybody should be trained on how to use a firearm. im not a gun guy myself, but with the way the world is, there is no doubt that i will be in the near future learning how to shoot and purchasing one. especially because i have a family. ill be damned if someone wants to break into my house and victimize me and my family. its not happening on my watch. too much evil out there to be left unprotected. 

Gun control doesn't infringe on the second amendment.
Gun control isn't a banning of guns.
Gun control has factually be proven to reduce gun related crime and incidents. (Accidental or Intentional.)
Australia has over 4 million legally registered guns today, which is an increase from the 3 million before gun control.



We are still a free country, we are still a thriving country... And our children can go to school and be safe without needing armed guards, prison bars on windows and more.
To argue to the contrary flies in the face of decades worth of evidence that Australia has presented since it introduced gun control.

In the end, he lived by the statement that it's acceptable to have gun related deaths and he became one of his own statistics, so I stand by the words that he is partly to blame for his own death, he lobbied and argued to retain the status quo, he lobbied and argued to keep guns as a free-for-all, it is partly (not entirely as it's a systemic issue) his own fault that he was shot.

The USA needs to change, because the current status quo isn't acceptable, isn't working.
One death is way to many.






--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--