Otter said:
BraLoD said:
There is not way it will cost $650 even if they were to subsidize it. The Series X is already just $50 less expensive than that, and the 2TB model is already $80 more expensive than that, and that is current gen. |
I feel like people forgotten that the Series S exists and helped MS actually sell well during the chip shortage. At one point the majority of Xbox systems sold were S'. There will be a low-end and high end machine, based on the same principle. And SerieX can't function as the "low-end" entry point because it doesn't have the AI/Deeplearning capacity that will shape the future systems. |
The only reason the Series S sold well was because it was the only current-gen option available that wasn't out of stock. Microsoft's decision to prioritize the Series S was out of necessity, as they couldn't manufacture enough Series X units to meet demand
Once the supply shortage of PS5 ended, Series S sales dropped off quickly. This isn't to say that offering both high-end and budget models is a bad strategy, but being a "budget version" is clearly not a strong selling point, as both the Switch Lite and Series S are currently demonstrating. People who can afford new gaming released, can easily afford extra hardware cost
The real barrier to gaming today isn't the 100-150 USD price difference in hardware, but the high cost of software. With most popular games requiring paid online services, the hard truth is that if someone can't afford modern gaming, it's usually because new game releases are simply too expensive not because of lack of budgeted hardware. It's no surprise that only 15% of the Steam user base has played games released in 2024