Thinking on it now, the difference between the Youtubers and all the bad stuff mentioned by them but not in those 9/10 written reviews I'm convinced they were given financial incentive or were coming out to save Ubisoft. The 10/10 from VGC is very clearly lying now. I remember him mentioning it as the biggest Assassin's creed ever but from everyone else praises as a positive that it isn't even half the size of Valhalla and many people say they dialed back all the markers as a good thing but went too far and left the world feeling empty, I think he was the same one that said it is immaculately researched. That must have been what they were using the delay tike to clean up. Gonna leave it up to the public to break thar sentence apart. Fuck access media, we have such a big problem in this industry and Opencritic and Mrtaceitic need to hold these sites to it and remove their allowance to be apart of the aggregate. ACG said he felt the game was punishing him the first dozen hours, as so many else have said the game is bad for the first 12 to 14 hours so I now believe now this isn't going to have legs, def an FF16 situation. The fans will buy on and then noone else will follow them.
Also, watched some dialogue and it is terrible, it almost feels racist that they put on Japanese accents which is ACs thing but they speak like they are still learning English but struggling to do so which makes it feel like sterotypical mockery. It actually might be racist tbh. Whatever the case it is horrendous on all levels, very flat phoned in with zero enthusiasm. Something not largely mentioned by written reviews.
Last edited by LegitHyperbole - on 19 March 2025