LegitHyperbole said:
The hope is AI will make things better but yes, it's definitely more noticeable these days for some reason but it's not bad in some films that rely on visuals and HDR, I was still impressed with Top Gun Maverivk...although, that is basically a drama as to your point. I don't really care for 4K tbh but it has one benefit of making streaming crisper and making the quality loss very easily ignorable, my brain doesn't even pick up on it until very fast moving scenes. But yeah, when the image is moving as fast at every moment and the scene changes are so numerous in Across the Spider verse it the quality loss is so bad it is noticeable even on my phones 6 inch screen which is actually a really impressive little screen, my S24 is 2600 nits with blacks so deep they are unnaturally black and stand out against natural black with the lights off, it's as good as the most ecpensive of TVs... if it wasn't for those damn rounded edges and the hole punch. I hope the Blu Ray doesn't spoil me but you mentioned people choose streaming over convenience but it's most cost as the biggest reason, Blu Rays are very ecpensive for one film it doesn't as much as a month of Netflix or one month of Apple TV, Prime Video and Disney+ Combined. |
Yeah that's why we had Blockbuster ;) (And Netflix started as a rental service via post)
But yeah, renting was inconvenient and still $10 for 3 newer releases for a weekend rental.
The reason it looks worse today is because Netflix etc can get away with lower bitrates / higher compression. Blu-Ray goes up to 48 mbps for picture and sound, 4K blu-ray up to 128 mbps. Netflix 1080p is 3-7 mbps, 4K was 18-20 mbps, but is now max 15 mbps.
They already started reducing bandwidth in 2020
https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1602743673
Still, it is clear that Netflix is focusing mainly on reducing bandwidth rather than using the optimizations to deliver improved, less compressed 4K video quality.
It's true that 4K Netflix (and Blu-ray) use more efficient compression than Blu-ray (H.265 HEVC vs H.264 on standard Blu-ray) but it's still max twice as efficient (for some more loss in fine detail), thus 1080p Blu-ray's 48 mbps is still higher detail than 4K Streaming, comparable to 24mbps H.265. It's fine for slower movies, yet with a lot of water / smoke / fire effects in action scenes, bitrate matters.
Blu-ray doesn't really spoil at least. You notice it looks more clear and stable, then you forget about it again when the choice is find that blu-ray (and sit through all the warnings and other nonsense) or just stream what's in front of you :/
The industry screwed itself by making blu-ray less convenient than DVD with all the crap you can't skip.
DVD was a huge success because it was better in any shape or form than VHS. Then Blu-ray managed to make the user experience worse again :/ Longer load times, multiple unskippable warnings, stupid questions while its loading so you can't even just put in and walk away until the menu is ready (usually language choice, why not global setting, and asking to go online to download commercials!...) Then for many titles resume won't work and you're stuck with the same crap again then have to ffwd to where you were.
Can't blame people for choosing streaming when the alternative's user experience is awful.