By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - BioWare: Is the Wii Actually Gaming?

NJ5 said:
As always, some people go on offtopic rants instead of replying to the topic at hand. This is not about hardcore or casual, it's about the declarations of someone who just created a new definition of gaming with the intent of criticizing the Wii.

I don't know. They could of just invented that definition of gaming because that's what they believe gaming is... story first above all else.

I used to be like that... until I realized just about every story is exactly the same, the characters are the same and you can pick out EVERY damn twist in a game quicker then you can a murder mystery written by the local highschool's drama teacher.

It's natural to think whatever you focus on the most is the most important aspect of whatever you're doing.  I don't think he's actually trying to spite the wii.  I just think he is mistaken.



Around the Network
Words Of Wisdom said:
Desroko said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
Viper1 said:
Words Of Wisdom said:

Well said Viper1.

The difference here is that I understand what his point was whereas a lot of people are just dismissing it as casual Wii-bashing...

A person in his position must take care with what words he/she chooses to express their opinions with.

This guy failed at such a simple task to the degree that his words were callous in tone. Because he chose that tone it is quite easy to associate it with some form of angst against the Wii. Or in other words, Wii-bashing as you called it.

He took it upon himself to be illogical and rash where there was no provocation or casue for such tone. Can you give me one sinlge psychological reason why one would say what he did without any actual implied negativity?

 


People looking to be offended will be. If you want to believe what he's saying was insulting, you will. At this point I'm wondering if some Wii owners are to the point where any time anyone mentions the Wii without a boatload of praise they become annoyed. I'm a fellow Wii owner and I'm not insulted because I can see what he's talking about.


You agree that games that aren't story-driven aren't real games?


Go back and read what he said instead of making strawman arguments.  All he's saying is that heavily story-driven games and the like have thus far not been the focus of the Wii and he's dead-on-balls accurate with that assessment.


"...those kinds of experiences are much more like a toy experience. They're playing, together or not, but you're not 'gaming' anymore," argued Zeschuk. "If gaming is defined by story, then generally Wii may not be."



Words Of Wisdom said:
Desroko said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
Viper1 said:
Words Of Wisdom said:

Well said Viper1.

The difference here is that I understand what his point was whereas a lot of people are just dismissing it as casual Wii-bashing...

A person in his position must take care with what words he/she chooses to express their opinions with.

This guy failed at such a simple task to the degree that his words were callous in tone. Because he chose that tone it is quite easy to associate it with some form of angst against the Wii. Or in other words, Wii-bashing as you called it.

He took it upon himself to be illogical and rash where there was no provocation or casue for such tone. Can you give me one sinlge psychological reason why one would say what he did without any actual implied negativity?

 


People looking to be offended will be. If you want to believe what he's saying was insulting, you will. At this point I'm wondering if some Wii owners are to the point where any time anyone mentions the Wii without a boatload of praise they become annoyed. I'm a fellow Wii owner and I'm not insulted because I can see what he's talking about.


You agree that games that aren't story-driven aren't real games?


Go back and read what he said instead of making strawman arguments.  All he's saying is that heavily story-driven games and the like have thus far not been the focus of the Wii and he's dead-on-balls accurate with that assessment.

WoW, if that was all he was syaing, then that should have been all he said.   Why add ridiculous claims wrapped in angst to make a point far better spoken with in a straight forward manner?

 



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Hawk said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
Hawk said:

Hehe, funny.

But what gets me, is he is saying anything previous to this gen and the PS3 and Xbox 360 could not have a story. So for instance, no Final Fantasy has ever had a story.


Actually what he's saying makes perfect sense. None of the current Wii lineup are really defined by their stories. Would you like to argue that Super Mario Galaxy's story was awesome? Super Mario Strikers? Brawl? ...? The Wii doesn't have a lot of games with detailed stories at the moment.


I won't argue that Wii is lacking in good story driven games. I really hope that changes over time. But his statement doesn't make much sense. If he's just plain talking about the Wii lacking story driven games currently, as opposed to it's ability to have one, then it would make good buisness sense to be the one of the first to fill that hole in the best selling current gen system, not the other way around, and avoid it.


Maybe.  There is a distinct lack of giant pink top hats among US Corporate CEOs, do see that as a viable business to go into?   Part of being a good business analyst is being able to spot the difference between an opening in the market and a "non-need."

I'd love more RPGs though.  What the Wii needs is for a title/developer to prove that there is demand for them. 



Words Of Wisdom said:

I really stopped reading your post here because there was really nothing more to read.  Not only is it clear that you do not like the games they produce which is entirely fair since not everyone has the same taste in games, but you also clearly lack the ability to read what has been said.  I mentioned best WRPG developer because IMO that's what they are. 

The fact that you can't even name their competition (Bethesda? Obsidian? Red Studio? Soon maybe Lionhead) just shows that you're entirely ignorant of this subject.  If you can't add to the discussion then don't try.

 Terrible gameplay, poor UI design and worthless AI do are not forgiven under the "It's not your kind of game so STFU" clause.

This isn't the act of paying a 450 pound woman to beat the crap out of you. It's playing a game.

The former CERTAINLY involves a degree of personal preference in the criterion for enjoying the activity. The latter, however, has universal factors which are open to critique regardless of general preference, and it's with the experience of playing their games that I can point out the holes in their logic.

I forget who said it in the other thread, but Epic shakes a fist at the Wii because it focuses on gameplay over graphics and BioWare is basically mimicking the act, since their games generally feature lack-luster gameplay and focus more on graphics and narrative.

However, BioWare has less to complain about, since they don't build graphics engines AND they're making an RPG for the DS, so calling the Wii "not gaming" and basing their claims upon its focus on new types of gameplay is nonsensical, especially when even Nintendo routinely makes games like SSBB which use traditional control methods.

They're not nearly as angsty as Epic was, though, and they come off as sounding more indifferent than anti-Wii. 



"I mean, c'mon, Viva Pinata, a game with massive marketing, didn't sell worth a damn to the "sophisticated" 360 audience, despite near-universal praise--is that a sign that 360 owners are a bunch of casual ignoramuses that can't get their heads around a 'gardening' sim? Of course not. So let's please stop trying to micro-analyze one game out of hundreds and using it as the poster child for why good, non-1st party, games can't sell on Wii. (Everyone frequenting this site knows this is nonsense, and yet some of you just can't let it go because it's the only scab you have left to pick at after all your other "Wii will phail1!!1" straw men arguments have been put to the torch.)" - exindguy on Boom Blocks

Around the Network

1. Sonic Rush wasn't bad?

2. This article further confused me than it probably should of.

Is he saying what the title says the articles about?

It's like the words are english... but the logical patterns aren't there.

Oh well, I think he basically said, gaming is fun by yourself and with others.

Then said that some games involve no narrative in or out of the game, thus they are toys?

To which I respond what the heck was the question: Going to have to read the article source I guess, no wait guess I dont as the guy didn't answer the question he just went in tangent of it.

Well this is pointless... or is he saying that games w/o narrative are another thing and games with narrative (in or out of the game) are doing their own thing.



I'm Unamerica and you can too.

The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread: 



The Hunt Begins 4/20/2010 =D

Viper1 said:

WoW, if that was all he was syaing, then that should have been all he said. Why add ridiculous claims wrapped in angst to make a point far better spoken with in a straight forward manner?

I think the way the question was phrased had a bit to do with that, but I can't speak for him in that regard.  I know what I think he meant, but that's about it.



Smash_Brother said:
Words Of Wisdom said:

I really stopped reading your post here because there was really nothing more to read. Not only is it clear that you do not like the games they produce which is entirely fair since not everyone has the same taste in games, but you also clearly lack the ability to read what has been said. I mentioned best WRPG developer because IMO that's what they are.

The fact that you can't even name their competition (Bethesda? Obsidian? Red Studio? Soon maybe Lionhead) just shows that you're entirely ignorant of this subject. If you can't add to the discussion then don't try.

Terrible gameplay, poor UI design and worthless AI do are not forgiven under the "It's not your kind of game so STFU" clause.

This isn't the act of paying a 450 pound woman to beat the crap out of you. It's playing a game.

The former CERTAINLY involves a degree of personal preference in the criterion for enjoying the activity. The latter, however, has universal factors which are open to critique regardless of general preference, and it's with the experience of playing their games that I can point out the holes in their logic.

I forget who said it in the other thread, but Epic shakes a fist at the Wii because it focuses on gameplay over graphics and BioWare is basically mimicking the act, since their games generally feature lack-luster gameplay and focus more on graphics and narrative.

However, BioWare has less to complain about, since they don't build graphics engines AND they're making an RPG for the DS, so calling the Wii "not gaming" and basing their claims upon its focus on new types of gameplay is nonsensical, especially when even Nintendo routinely makes games like SSBB which use traditional control methods.


What games do you like then? Seriously, Bioware games have terrific gameplay. Neverwinter Nights is still alive today by the virtue of its multiplayer and *shock* gameplay. The UI design with quickslots was fantastic for its time and the radial menu is neat and has made an appearance in tons of games. Jade Empire was another great game. Heck, my single complaint with Jade Empire is that I wished there had be more battles because I really enjoyed the combat. In an RPG, too few battles is almost unheard of. I'm definitely looking forward to the PC version of Mass Effect and to their "it's done when it's done" original IP Dragon Age.

As for your complaints about Bioware focusing on graphics... WTF. Bioware certainly doesn't skimp on their games, but bleeding edge effects are certainly not what they're known for.

As for SSBB... that was a megahit before it was even released. Expecting that level of success with a new IP on an unfamiliar system would be insanity. SSBB could focus on control with an electrified potato and it would have still sold at least a million copies. SSBB could do whatever it liked.



Words Of Wisdom said:
Viper1 said:

WoW, if that was all he was syaing, then that should have been all he said. Why add ridiculous claims wrapped in angst to make a point far better spoken with in a straight forward manner?

I think the way the question was phrased had a bit to do with that, but I can't speak for him in that regard.  I know what I think he meant, but that's about it.


Zeschuk: It is, I agree, that's actually the strongest experience. I'm making the claim that it may not be gaming.

BIZ: Well there's the quote: BioWare says Wii is not gaming! [laughs]

Zeschuk: If gaming is defined by story, then generally Wii may not be.

 

If you don't find this illogical, I think we can end our debate here.  



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Viper1 said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
Viper1 said:

WoW, if that was all he was syaing, then that should have been all he said. Why add ridiculous claims wrapped in angst to make a point far better spoken with in a straight forward manner?

I think the way the question was phrased had a bit to do with that, but I can't speak for him in that regard. I know what I think he meant, but that's about it.


Zeschuk: It is, I agree, that's actually the strongest experience. I'm making the claim that it may not be gaming.

BIZ: Well there's the quote: BioWare says Wii is not gaming! [laughs]

Zeschuk: If gaming is defined by story, then generally Wii may not be.

 

If you don't find this illogical, I think we can end our debate here.


You are correct; I must have skipped over that part of the interview.  I agree with you. 

Well argued.  ^_^