Pfft, Ride to Hell Retribution is 60fps. Arkane should get some of those guys to help development.

If The Coalition isn't already on Redfall then loan them out to Bethesda, Lol.

They're the masters at Unreal Engine, I'm sure they can provide major help to Arkane with the 60fps patch.

Turns out CMA's papers today aren't public, Lol.

Have to wait for a leak.

For me it was one of my favorite elements, and FFXV lacked it after FF Versus 13 had it (at least on launch when I played it), and now FF16 lacks it as well. FF7R has it thankfully, but it is still yet to hit Xbox sadly. 

I have never been into these high pace action games, I have sensory issues and these super fast paced action games cause sensory overload for me. The addition of the auto-dodge and auto-block accessories in FF16 will certainly help with that, Nier Automata had them and allowed me to play it, and the same with the Ninja Gaiden trilogy remaster, they added an auto-block accessory for it which helped me alot too. But even with the accessory I would still prefer a mid-pace action RPG to a fast paced one, FF7R combat is far more my speed, as well Kingdom Hearts and Witcher 3 and such. It's only these fast paced action games that I struggle with, I played the mid paced action RPG combat of Dragon Age Inquisition on the highest difficulty, Nightmare, just as a for instance.

Round 1 - Goes to Axon, 9-0 decision.

I have no idea why people think Starfield would be locked to 30 fps on launch. While there is an interview with Todd Howard from like 2 years ago where he said he thought 30 fps was sufficient for their style of games, and the E3 gameplay last year had some drops below 30 fps when Digital Foundry ran it through their testing software, I feel like Bethesda knows that in 2023 you need to have both a 30 fps fidelity mode and a 60 fps performance mode, with an additional balanced mode designed for VRR monitors being preferred. If they didn't know that before now, they certainly know it after seeing this immense Redfall 30 fps backlash, and they have 5 months now before launch in September to make sure that there is an optional 60 fps performance mode running at a lower resolution.

Actually you really do not know if its possible.  Its something they say they will attempt to do but how stable that is we will have to see.  For as many games I have played that promise 60fps only to have a very unstable 60fps, it seems to me to be more a marketing thing for the 60fps crowd then actually hitting 60fps consistently.  Anyway, until the game release and we get a chance to play it, we can see about judging how well the game plays.

Think about it this way: Right now, basically most core gamers hate Redfall. Between watching IGN clumsily play it, the multiple controversies (always online, host only co-op progress, no 60 fps on launch on consoles, Denuvo DRM on PC, etc.), hype for the game is at an all time low, and that is saying something because Redfall never had that much hype ever since it's initial announcement trailer which was poorly designed. So most core gamers hate it then, what about the casual shooter players? Well they're all off playing CoD Warzone and Fortnite and Apex Legends and such right now, they don't even know Redfall exists. The only way they give Redfall a chance is if the core gamers like it enough that it becomes a huge hit with the streamers they watch, giving those casuals exposure to the game through streamers.

What a delay gives them:

-Time to quickly put together a new gameplay demo for Redfall, with either professional shooter players or Arkane's most skilled at shooters employees playing it in co-op and presenting the game in the best light possible. Most of the gameplay footage released so far has looked lackluster, but we have heard from the preview testers that it's not the game itself that is the problem, Arkane has just continually managed to release underwhelming gameplay demos for it, and now IGN, who they chose to partner with for IGN First, has too. That demo can then be played on Xbox's Summer Showcase, which typically sees peak concurrent viewer numbers of over 2m people, plus millions more who go back and watch the VoD on youtube. That is 2m+ people seeing a good gameplay demo for Redfall, as opposed to a mere 180k people who have watched the poor IGN First gameplay. They have the opportunity then to completely drown out the IGN First blunder by exposing a better looking demo to more than 10x as many viewers. 

-Time to get both the 60 fps mode and the offline play options, which are both planned for after release currently, into the game at release after the delay. Fixing Redfall's 2 most controversial issues at release will go a long way towards increasing hype.

There other option is of course to just cut their losses and release in May as planned. What that does is pretty much automatically chase away the entire crowd who now finds 30 fps unacceptable, which is like 40% of potential players for the game. While there is a chance they come back and play it after 60 fps has been added post-release, many of them will be too busy with the new releases whenever the Redfall 60 fps patch drops to come back and give Redfall a 2nd chance. You usually only get one chance for success with a game release, it's rare for a comeback miracle like Halo MCC or Cyberpunk 2077 to happen in the gaming market. 

They said 60fps performance mode WILL BE ADDED at later date.

60fps is marketing thing..? What on Earth are you on about?