By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
 

As a Consumer Would You Rather?

Traditional Console + Everything Exclusive 20 42.55%
 
Xbox/PC Hybrid + Access t... 27 57.45%
 
Total:47
Ryuu96 said:
EpicRandy said:

Actually it's a viable options as there does not really need to be a buyer to divest. I confirmed this with chatGPT so that's it with a grain of salt but it looks reasonable and accurate.

My question "Is there a form of company divestment where the divested part is made public and share of the new entity is distributed among shareholder of the prior whole company?".

Answer : 

Yes, there is a form of company divestment where the divested part is made public and shares of the new entity are distributed among the shareholders of the prior whole company. This type of divestment is called a spin-off, and it involves a parent company creating a new, independent company by separating a division or business unit and distributing its shares to the parent company's shareholders.

In a spin-off, the new company is usually structured as a separate legal entity with its own board of directors and management team, and it operates independently from the parent company. Shareholders of the parent company receive shares of the new company in proportion to their ownership in the parent company, allowing them to participate in the growth and profits of both companies. Spin-offs are often used by companies to unlock value and improve their overall performance by allowing each company to focus on its core strengths and business operations.

I knew the term spin-off but assumed it was just synonym to selling part of a company rather than being it's own separate process (we learn every day). But that said if CMA want divestment in this case it is possible they won't accept spin-off because with the same pool of shareholders it is likely that it act as a strong 2nd party to MS.

Does that mean Activision-Blizzard shareholders? So basically Bobby would remain as CEO?

Interesting but what would that mean for the contracts that Microsoft has negotiated with Nvidia and Nintendo? Will they now be void?

Well...That does sound like a viable option but depending on the answer to my above questions, there could be a few negatives to it still. I'd also wonder if that would even be acceptable for the CMA if they're set on structural remedies. Wouldn't Microsoft still have some sort of notable influence over Activision even if they "operate independently"

No this mean MS make the purchase then spin-off making MS Shareholder also the shareholder of the new Entity and not the prior ABK shareholder as this could not be done prior to the transaction completion as it would completely change what the deals is about.

In regards to all 10 years deal MS should be able to force the new entity to uphold those as the entity is created and "sold" by MS so it may include whatever clause it want in the procedure including upholding all 10 years deal. it could also add day one GamePass as mandatory but the CMA would likely again take issue with this. (ex: My father recently sold the family business to my older brother at an advantageous price but added clause that if he were to sell it he must try to sell to family member first for something like 70% the market value and that this clause remain for the next 40 years).

Wouldn't Microsoft still have some sort of notable influence over Activision even if they "operate independently

Yes as stated prior the CMA may think this avenue would only create a very strong 2nd party to MS and so be insufficient but the thing is the new entity would be publicly traded so the issue should resolve itself before long.



Around the Network

01 Iceland - Development Diary | Senua's Saga: Hellblade II - YouTube



Another update for clarity, Lol.

EU is not expected to block or ask Microsoft to divest so it definitely looks like they're happy with the behavioural remedies.



This actually looks pretty good. Maybe the combined efforts of Sumo and Dambuster actually pulled this off.



If Ninja Theory is starting up Development Diaries again this early in the year, then I'm fully believing that Hellblade II will be a Holiday 2023 release.



Around the Network

Dead Island 2 looks extremely good in that gameplay trailer.

Great dismemberment system.







Ryuu96 said:

After watching the dev diary, maybe the game isn't as far along in development as I'm thinking lol



gtotheunit91 said:
Ryuu96 said:

After watching the dev diary, maybe the game isn't as far along in development as I'm thinking lol

Considering Hellblade 2 entered development either late 2018 or early 2019 and already had in-engine footage ready for the Game Awards 2019 reveal, you would think it would be pretty far along in development now, especially since the dev team is rumored to be like 80 devs, 4x more than first game's 20 person dev team. Maybe the scope is truly huge or something, open world instead of linear like the first game, and maybe like 4 or 5 times more content than the 8ish hour long first game.