The minimum rate her main union (U.K's sister union to the American Actor's Guild) has been negotiating with its clients sounds like a good rate for the work she's been doing. 

https://www.equity.org.uk/news/2021/december/uks-first-ever-agreement-for-voice-artists-engaged-on-video-game-recordings/#:~:text=Minimum%20fees%20are%20set%20according,(under%20%C2%A30.5m).

600 GBP per hour for first day, 300 GBP per hour for each subsequent day.

But the video game voiceover contract for the American Actor Union is ending next month, they should strike and ask for royalties imo.

Maybe the % of the revenue that their hours represents in total employment over the development period as an additional bonus.

So if the game nets a revenue of $60 million and their individual effort/collective effort of all employees is say 1 week /(52 weeks in year*200 employees*5 years) = .00192% of total employee effort. That'd give them an bonus of $1,152 from revenue of $60,000. 

Well good luck to them. I doubt it will go well because voice actors are just not a selling point for a game. The worst case Ive ever seen is what happened to David Hayter. He had been the voice of Snake for like 20 years, he was very beloved by MGS fans and he got to know about his replacement by reading an article or tweet from Kojima or something like that. Metal Gear Solid V became the best selling game in the franchise in like 2 weeks. Also God Of War keep selling better with each iteration even though the voice actor changes. So they are in for a tough fight.

If people only work part time as a VA, sounds like they should have as second job to fill in the gaps.  People are too entitled.

Ok how much should she recieve then? You keep saying its not enough, what is enough then? Give me a number.

If people need to work part time because VA doesn't pay enough then you won't have good professionals doing the work and quality will suffer. I would guess people from US/UK haven't faced terrible dub work because of bad professionals.

She didn't receive anything since she wasn't hired. You mean how much she was offered? Whatever it was it was less than 4k which is being throw around as the base payment for VA on expected duration of work.

Yeah, and you seem to think thats ridiculous. So how much is fair for her to be paid?

The evaluation of what is fair is between her and company. But a value that would allow a professional a living standard is base for fair imho.

So you would need to get what is standard cost for living wherever she is on a year, divide by what is standard number of days working a year on the profession and you would have daily amount payment (let's be real, it makes very little sense to expect someone would be dubbing for 3 different companies on a single day on a regular basis).

That probably give you the minimum that was already given to you by sc94597 that in USA would be about 4k USD for this work of in UK 5.6k pounds. And when the 4k is the final offer will you pretend the previous one was higher than this? Or will you accept that PG was offering less than the minimum?

Found the relevant U.K law regarding NDA's and pay. Seems like the U.K law is actually less labor-friendly than American law on this topic. "Secrecy clauses" can apply in so much as the employee isn't comparing compensation to find out if they are underpaid as a protected class. Wild. 

https://www.mytipsandadvice.co.uk/2019-09/are-pay-secrecy-clauses-legal-UKPPPSAR_EU03050301

It’s not unlawful to have a contractual pay secrecy clause. However, it will be unenforceable to the extent that it prevents an employee from seeking or disclosing pay information to establish if any difference in pay relates to a protected characteristic and so amounts to possible pay discrimination.

i like how you dumbasses keep assuming its 4x4 hours not considering 1x4 or 2x4 or 3x4 but just speculate on halfassed info