By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Bayonetta OG Voice Actress Calls For Boycott of Bayonetta 3

sc94597 said:
JWeinCom said:

No.

Relative to means correlated with. And those things are indeed correlated. The more value they perceive, the higher a fair price should be and vice versa. And it's hard to argue that's not the case. Unless you'd like to argue that perceived value of the service doesn't have anything to do with what a fair price should be. I would assume you wouldn't want to argue that because it would be pretty stupid, but you can surprise me if you want. 

But that doesn't mean the perceived value of the service to the employer is the only factor correlated with fairness, and it should have been pretty clear from the post that wasn't even in the ballpark of what I meant. If it wasn't, now it is.

You said, "Sounds like they just really did not want her to work, but would be willing to change their minds if she was able to do it much cheaper than a voice actress they think was more valuable. If that's the case, I don't really fault them."

Is the bolded an ethical and fair mechanism of employing people in your opinion, given that the other voice actress is covered by a union that has negotiated minimums equivalent to the raised offers? You seemed to think is fine when you say, "If that's the case, I don't really fault them." But I don't know, it might be stupid of me to assume. 

Yes. If I think you're worth more I pay you more. Josh Allen makes more money than Sam Darnold. Seems pretty fair.

https://twitter.com/hellenataylor

Here is Ms. Taylor's Twitter. You will notice that on the page it says Actor, Director, Writer, Filmmaker & Barge Owner. Trained at LAMDA, Equity, SAG/AFTRA, US work visa & EU.papers

So yes, really stupid of you to suggest that I'm ok with them offering a non-union actor a lower rate to avoid paying the union minimum when they are in fact both in the union. 

And... you just said that unions don't matter because she's British and they're Japanese. So, you're arguing that unions are relevant and not at the same time. And that's not even how it works. SAG members are obligated to refuse non-union jobs anywhere in the world, which in turn means that Platinum has to abide by SAG terms if the want to use any SAG actors, which apparently they do. 

You're just pulling shit out of your ass, which reminds me of who you are and why I decided not to waste time on you, so I'll go back to doing that. Thanks for the reminder. You can respond to this if you like, but after that, do not quote or engage me pleaseandthankyou.

Last edited by JWeinCom - on 18 October 2022

Around the Network
sc94597 said:
KLXVER said:

1. So what if the job required 10 hours of work?

2. They do, thats why they schedule it. If it goes over, they have to pay more.

3. So what the fuck does it actually do for their clients then?

1. That is why it seems typical to negotiate an hourly rate rather than a flat one. They didn't seem to do that here. 

2. Not if the contract stipulates that she'll be paid a flat-rate regardless of how many hours it takes. As long as they are abiding by the minimum wage laws in the country she resides in, that probably won't be legally tenuous. 

3. I am not sure what you are asking here. Since most American VA's seem to be part of the SAG-AFTRA the union de-facto sets industry standards (given that most English-speaking VA's are working in the U.S) but that doesn't mean they set rates by law, and certainly doesn't mean it sets rates by law in a country that the union's membership doesn't reside in. The sleazy part here is the aim of a multi-million dollar company which is being bankrolled by a billion dollar company to get cheap labor that has already proven itself to be excellent at the job and then lying about why that person didn't take the job. 

Well you act like this is a unique case. This happens to pretty much all voice actors. If they want more, then they need to negotiate and ask for help from whatever union their in. Helena did negotiate and PG came back with what they think she was worth. She believed she was worth more and didnt take the offer. Now she made 0 dollars and broke her NDA. I dont blame her for being insulted by the offer, but thats just something voice actors have to live with until they can negotiate better deals.



sc94597 said:
KLXVER said:

1. You dont know how much she was offered at first

2. You dont know how many hours she would have to record

3. If they offered her less than what the union demands, then why did Helena herself say that they did nothing illegal? That it was just immoral.

1. We know it is less than $4,000. 

2. Nobody knows beforehand how many hours it would take to record. 

3. She is British, and an American union doesn't legally bind negotiations between a Japanese company and a British person. Nor does it really bind negotiations between a Japanese company and an American citizen who is not part of the union. Legal =|= ethical

U were first reasonable, but now ur trying too hard to take Hellena's side and it's making ur statements illogical. And I'll be honest, I didn't read everything so it's very likely other people are saying something illogical as well and the whole conversation turning into a shitshow. Most of us aren't really against Hellena nor taking any side. We are just pointing out stuff we found odd from either her response, or statements we see. Especially since it looks like a lot of people are jumping to conclusion and taking Hellana's side without any evidence (not u specifically) but mostly on twitter. So I, specifically, am not on Hellena's side... yet, and nobody should be, bcuz there are still some unsettling things about this whole situation. 

Last edited by Shatts - on 18 October 2022

JWeinCom said:

Yes. If I think you're worth more I pay you more. Josh Allen makes more money than Sam Darnold. Seems pretty fair.

https://twitter.com/hellenataylor

Here is Ms. Taylor's Twitter. You will notice that on the page it says Actor, Director, Writer, Filmmaker & Barge Owner. Trained at LAMDA, Equity, SAG/AFTRA, US work visa & EU.papers

So yes, really stupid of you to suggest that I'm ok with them offering a non-union actor a lower rate to avoid paying the union minimum when they are in fact both in the union. 

Either way, I'm not going to waste any more time arguing about positions I don't actually hold.

So your original response to my reply was that I had misrepresented you by taking your position to be that you absolutely think the employer is the sole determiner of fair employee value/wages and then you respond here with "If I think you're worth more I pay you more."

Are there instances where employers think somebody is worth more than another employee, they aren't, and shouldn't be paid more? In those cases does "If I think you're worth more I pay you more" apply as fair? Is it ethical to provide a low-ball offer (which you yourself admitted seemingly happened) to somebody because you'd rather have somebody else, but you want to see if they'll take the low wage, which I'd assume you agree is very different from merely paying more for somebody you value more?

And I don't see how her being part of SAGAFTRA makes it better and not worse. The union rates were posted earlier in this thread.

https://www.sagaftra.org/files/2020InteractiveRateSheetFinal.pdf

Given the time she spent in the prior games, unless something is drastically different in Bayonetta 3 in terms of time-commitment they initially tried to not pay her union rates? 

Edit: Just read your edit. Wow...

Last edited by sc94597 - on 18 October 2022

KLXVER said:
sc94597 said:

1. That is why it seems typical to negotiate an hourly rate rather than a flat one. They didn't seem to do that here. 

2. Not if the contract stipulates that she'll be paid a flat-rate regardless of how many hours it takes. As long as they are abiding by the minimum wage laws in the country she resides in, that probably won't be legally tenuous. 

3. I am not sure what you are asking here. Since most American VA's seem to be part of the SAG-AFTRA the union de-facto sets industry standards (given that most English-speaking VA's are working in the U.S) but that doesn't mean they set rates by law, and certainly doesn't mean it sets rates by law in a country that the union's membership doesn't reside in. The sleazy part here is the aim of a multi-million dollar company which is being bankrolled by a billion dollar company to get cheap labor that has already proven itself to be excellent at the job and then lying about why that person didn't take the job. 

Well you act like this is a unique case. This happens to pretty much all voice actors. If they want more, then they need to negotiate and ask for help from whatever union their in. Helena did negotiate and PG came back with what they think she was worth. She believed she was worth more and didnt take the offer. Now she made 0 dollars and broke her NDA. I dont blame her for being insulted by the offer, but thats just something voice actors have to live with until they can negotiate better deals.

One of the things we've seen on twitter are VA's taking Hellena's side about how the pay is trash and how pay for VA's is trash in general. The problem is that it isn't a unique case. What is your position on Platinum Games lying? 

Last edited by sc94597 - on 18 October 2022

Around the Network
sc94597 said:
KLXVER said:

Well you act like this is a unique case. This happens to pretty much all voice actors. If they want more, then they need to negotiate and ask for help from whatever union their in. Helena did negotiate and PG came back with what they think she was worth. She believed she was worth more and didnt take the offer. Now she made 0 dollars and broke her NDA. I dont blame her for being insulted by the offer, but thats just something voice actors have to live with until they can negotiate better deals.

One of the things we've seen on twitter are VA's taking Helenna's side about how the pay is trash and how pay for VA's is trash in general. The problem is that it isn't a unique case. What is your position on Platinum Games lying? 

I dont think they lied. Helena was the one that said PG said that "she didnt have room in her schedule". Thats not what they said. They said "various overlapping circumstances" which you can read many different ways. Its just a generic PR response.



sc94597 said:

So your original response to my reply was that I had misrepresented you by taking your position to be that you absolutely think the employer is the sole determiner of fair employee value/wages and then you respond here with "If I think you're worth more I pay you more." Are there instances where employers think somebody is worth more than another employee, they aren't, and shouldn't be paid more? In those cases does "If I think you're worth more I pay you more" apply as fair? 

And I don't see how her being part of SAGAFTRA makes it better and not worse. The union rates were posted earlier in this thread.

https://www.sagaftra.org/files/2020InteractiveRateSheetFinal.pdf

Given the time she spent in the prior games, unless something is drastically different in Bayonetta 3 in terms of time-commitment they initially tried to not pay her union rates? 

sc94597 said:

One of the things we've seen on twitter are VA's taking Helenna's side about how the pay is trash and how pay for VA's is trash in general. The problem is that it isn't a unique case. What is your position on Platinum Games lying? 

1. When did she mention her exact initial fee?

2. When did Platinum Games lie?



KLXVER said:
sc94597 said:

One of the things we've seen on twitter are VA's taking Helenna's side about how the pay is trash and how pay for VA's is trash in general. The problem is that it isn't a unique case. What is your position on Platinum Games lying? 

I dont think they lied. Helena was the one that said PG said that "she didnt have room in her schedule". Thats not what they said. They said "various overlapping circumstances" which you can read many different ways. Its just a generic PR response.

Fair enough. It seems like it was NintendoLife who initially interpreted that as "scheduling conflicts."



Shatts said:

1. When did she mention her initial fee was lower?

1. She said, "they gave me an insulting offer", then talked about how she wrote a letter to Kamiya, "and it is then that they offered me $4,000." Unless you think the initial offer was higher, I don't see how it could be interpreted any other way. 



sc94597 said:
Shatts said:

1. When did she mention her initial fee was lower?

1. She said, "they gave me an insulting offer", then talked about how she wrote a letter to Kamiya, "and it is then that they offered me $4,000." Unless you think the initial offer was higher, I don't see how it could be interpreted any other way. 

Ok I checked the third video and she did say that, I missed it. However, we still don't know what it was, and it's odd she doesn't say what the "insulting offer" was when it would help her claim more. If it was really bad, I feel like she would have said it and claimed she was offered an illegal amount. But she only said it was immoral and insulting. 4k was also insulting to her, so we don't know how much isn't insulting to her. Initial offer could well be higher than $4000 and Kamiya could have lowered the price knowing his personality, and she's only saying the $4000 to make it look worse. She said $4k was the final offer, but final offers can be lower. I'm stretching a bit here but I think it's a reasonable theory.

Last edited by Shatts - on 18 October 2022