kokokyuchitsune said: As someone who reads a lot of different internet forums, I hope no one minds me signing up just to quickly write this post. I can't speak for NeoGAF since I'm not even a member there, but I do read there a lot, and I do quite understand why they might ban this site. I can see why any site might ban this one.
No offense to all the work that goes into here, but discussion that references this site's numbers are more likely to lead to mindless conjecture and circle-jerking than any kind of intellectual debate. Many people can be quite uncomfortable with using guesstimates to base the crux of their argument from. And rightfully so, many times arguments have broken out when references to numbers here have been made - when NPD or company numbers are released things just break down entirely and many people are painted as fools or morons.
So perhaps, in the interest of keeping discussions as accurate as possible, keeping to what is known as (mostly) factual statistics and numbers, they might be justified in banning this site entirely. For all reasonable purposes, it has no effect on you, while their forum is a whole lot cleaner, and discussions more civil and realistic. Perhaps you may have some damaged pride, but I hope you can kind of see where I (or at least other sites) might be coming from in their attitude towards you - or more accurately - your numbers.
|
Great while we're at it lets get rid of the 1st amendment (US) and ban discussion of politics since we all know how much BS people spew on that topic. And since that pesky "Freedom of Religion" crap is gone now we can ban religion because god knows how many flame wars start from that!
Seriously, what kind of sense does it make to ban something just because of what might be said about it? You can rationalize it in your mind all you want but at the end of the day it's still censorship, and it's still nothing more than a control mechanism to make sure that a particular view is upheld without question.
If the issue was as cut & dry as many gaffers seem to think it is they would easily be able to defend their views. This is particularly true when you consider that the current community is already of one mind and they tightly control who is allowed to join. Sound like any system of governance you know of?
In any case, I don't want to tell them how to run their site, they can do whatever they want. But I just can't see how anyone can honestly think they have a rational position on this issue. Final-Fan's post really points out the hypocrisy of their position quite well so I won't go into it.
I hope a lot of gaffers read ioi's post and saw that there is no attempt to deceive here by VGC. At no point have the numbers ever been claimed as 100% accurate or "more accurate than NPD". This site is simply a team of people who've volunteered an enormous amount of time to make a free, comprehensive, and easily accessible database. And honestly if people want to turn their backs on that, thats fine...its their loss not ours.