Sony knows what matters.

@bolded:  Because that was the entire reason for my initial post.  You're quoting my response in your "examples" of users who disagree with you, so I'm clearing up (once again) what I'm disagreeing with:  The ridiculous comparison. 

So, a popular brand in the US for three generations now, has only a "slightly more possible" chance of regaining its 7th gen glory in the US than the PS5 outselling the PS2 in Japan?  It would take a miracle for the PS5 to sell even half of what the PS2 sold when Playstation was king of consoles in Japan. Completely lopsided comparison.

That's why they stopped after making PS All Star since they knew they stood no chance against Nintendo with the same type of games.

Welp... The worst was Faze. The og halo killer.

That was absolutely dreadful. I tried to like it so many times at my mates who was a Sony guy.. At the time... Who was convinced that it was halo but better.

He has since played halo. We still laugh his stupidity and faze to this day.

I remember Killzone on the PS2 being billed as a "Halo Killer" years before Haze.

Oh. I don't even remember hearing of a killzone before killzone 3 tbh so you're  right.

Yes, there were two Killzone games before Killzone 3.

Yes, in which I only discovered after hearing about the 3rd... Nor does killzone really take up much mind space for myself or the wider gaming community based on sales and review scores.

Shame I got the timing mixed up for another attempt at one company copying another and falling flat on it's face.... Yet again. 

I'd give you a gold star but Kakadu is rather far from Melbourne. Apologies for the delay. 

I sure can’t prove that they are alts, just like you can’t prove they are seven different people, or that they are seven people participating in this thread. The difference is you’re the one making statements about the beliefs of users here based on anonymous, irrelevant forum likes.

For example there’s a news article about Microsoft putting non-gameplay affecting ads in free to play games. Someone posted saying it’s fine for free to play but it should never come to paid games. That comment has like 15 dislikes right now. I guess that means I can say a ton of users on teh Chartz wants ads in their $60-70 games and they want the ads to interrupt gameplay. I arrive at that conclusion because of irrelevant and anonymous dislikes. 

Again, riveting. 

You could also interpret those dislikes as people not wanting ads in their free to play games whatsoever. Which, based on the general conversation on different forums like Era or Reddit, is a widely popular opinion. If those 15 people agreed with having ads in F2P but not in paid games, they would like the post, rather than downvote.

It's simple stuff, really.