FFS. It's one thing to stray off the topic, and it's another thing entirely to take someone's points from an on-topic thread and continue them where it's off-topic.

The problem is that too many countries were against this. Sweden for instance always said that NATO's there for that (even before they were in NATO). The question is if that could be reversed now.

Also NATO and the US naturally also strongly discourage the creation of an European Army. It's funny that they want Europe to shoulder a bigger share of the costs and defense of Europe, but when they actually want to do so, the US say no...

Also funny how the smallest partner was the first one to say out loud that we'd need an European army. Just after Trump's reelection, he said that Europe needs to stand on their own feet, but he went even further than most: He's in favor of Europe, as a union, getting a permanent seat at the UN security council.

It means he must perform it again on Germany for it to mean anything, eh?

Denmark and Canada aren't taking these threats lightly. I'd imagine they have more insight on the situation than some randos on VGChartz. Even if he is joking, he's sowing distrust amongst countries that are supposed to be allies. It's dangerously irresponsible, at best.  But particularly in the case of Greenland, he is not joking.

Greenland is not up for sale. Do you agree with that statement?

Canada is not up for sale either.

Trump is not crazy enough to take either country with military force, so both are safe.

Elon did it.  But Hillary has done it too. As has Obama, as has Harris, and even as has Bush.

I am sure you haven't seen any legit videos of the four others doing it.

Why do I need to see videos of the others doing it? The photos speak for themselves.