BLM, as I understand it, is a black lives matter, too instead of black lives matter less theme. It's to cover the idea that, while black lives have mattered less (in the eyes of police interactions and other racially unequal truths), the movement to the forefront of consciousness is simply to state: "hey, we're humans too". 

Therefore, I take the premise of BLM as not that their lives matter less, but also. Yes, the historical piece is the idea that African Americans have seen inequality as a result of their race for many, many years, but they're taking a stand on it by stating: "all lives cannot matter until our lives matter as well". Thus, its birth as a result of the acquittal of George Zimmerman.

Still, your study uses per capita figures for its mortality rates and when the same method is applied to crime incidents, then involvement of black people should also be around three times higher per capita than it is for white people. Or isn't that the case?

You did not fulfill the major request. What historical event(s) within African American community justify the many police interactions with them?In regard to what statistics (and then how it compares to statistics with other races)? I'm not asking as a user, I'm asking as a moderator. Your posts are obviously offensive and to potentially avoid action taken against you, I need answers on how these things have justifications. What is the history, in the United States, regarding African Americans, in a nutshell.

the culture and reputation that African American community have known to have.

Do i have to now collect all the crime data from various Police departments and list it out here?

Isn't there any common knowledge which everyone has?

That second part is also just a guess. Without another party having said "power", you will never know which side wants what. So, there is no point in making absolute statements based on "but one side has it, so all sides would want it". Beyond that, the United States is comprised of more than Black, Hispanic, and White.

Yeah but all the minorities band together.

And Sociology in all Multi-Cultural Societies have shown to be a battle between groups as to who will dominate.

As to what the party wants,you can go through a course in psychology.The other side isn't some alien that will think different,they want the same things as the current ruling class that is to rule.

I don't get your point.

I had the time to either read through some of the study or watch the John Oliver segment on critical race theory. Was time well spent.

If something is common knowledge, you should have no issue disclosing it. I asked for specific examples and data. "Culture and reputation" are fluff words without support columns.

So, don't make baseless claims that you cannot support, which is now a bigger issue for you. Generalizing a group of people, especially without justification, is not how to go about it.

One type of crime. Anyone could provide a sample statistic on a race based on one type of crime and draw conclusions. That also does not support the idea of "common knowledge". so your warning stands. 

Also, you do best not to make accusations. On top of the fact that you were let off easy with a warning which could easily seen you banned, you are under investigation for other reasons as well. "What historical event(s) within African American community justify the many police interactions with them" is not "the police only go after black people".

Anyone can come up with some "truth" about any race/color/creed. Doesn't mean we create full generalizations from cherry picked info. 

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/table-43

Read that and tell me why one would draw the same conclusion as you? And it's far more broad (and recent) than what you presented. 

Why should anyone trust your numbers? What gives them more validity? That is the overall point. It's all cherry picked. You presented a Wiki graph. You understand that Wiki can be easily manipulated by anyone?

Next, you can't ask questions about numbers you don't trust. If they're untrustworthy, then why should I believe those percentage rates? You're stuck in a trap that you're only way out of is to literally move on from. 

Should you remain part of the site, avoid generalizing people, particularly unjustly. That is all.