I hope these acquiring sprees just end.
Last edited by Kakadu18 - on 21 January 2022I hope these acquiring sprees just end.
Last edited by Kakadu18 - on 21 January 2022| Kakadu18 said: I hope these aquiring sprees just end. |
I just pity the dude who decides they need to buy EA unless they can get a discount on their reputation, come to think about it maybe MS got a Bobby Kotick discount.
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot
| Kakadu18 said: I hope these aquiring sprees just end. |
While it remains to be seen how this all shakes out, I'm not freaking out just yet because this is how the industry looked for most of my life. Not the acquisitions, per say. That's new. But for many years, each console was mostly segregated off from the others. During the PS1 and PS2 era, Sega and Nintendo and Microsoft got jack squat. But that was okay, because they had their own games that Playstation didn't have, and there was this wonderful dynamic between each system which made owning all three worthwhile. It also--in my opinion--made for a far more exciting industry. I mean, just look at the 16-bit era. Entire books and movies have been written about it.
So yeah, it's scary. And there's a chance this ends up being a really bad thing. But I think we'll be okay. If anything, it'll just light a fire under the other guy's behinds and we'll see a whole new slew of exciting IPs that we wouldn't have seen otherwise.
I think it’s a matter of when, not if, Sony will purchase a publisher at this point. Microsoft will have spent a combined nearly $80 billion on content over the course of 2 years, and Sony simply cannot afford not to respond to that. If they wanted to go big, they could attempt a merger with someone, although that carries with it substantial risk.
twintail said:
EA is not necessarily a bad get. They have content geared towards online, which is something Sony is lacking in (yet their deals with start up studios seem to be to cover this) |
I was being facetious, and thinking about EA's much touted reputation over the years for being the worst Videogame company in the world until recently anyway.
I would much prefer that this sort of aggressive buying stopped, but who knows there has to be a tipping point where Sony does a similar deal not in terms of outlay but in terms of numbers of IP's I expect that say that even capcom and square combined would cost considerably less.
People talk about Take Two, I feel like but I could be wrong, that Take Two really dont have the large portfolio of Ip's like EA and Activision and after GTA RRD Bioshock and NBA2k it falls away with Borderlands only being published and historically their roi and profits doesn't seem that great compared to the number of games that those Ip's sell.
My feeling is we may have to wait till after Spartacus is launched to get an indication into what direction Sony is heading.
Last edited by mjk45 - on 19 January 2022Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot


No. Stop buying everything. Leave big publishers alone. As for Konami, the only people who should buy Konami is something like Kadawowa. Not a console maker.
Btw Yes I love Bulk Slash. I own the Japanese version and the unofficial English version.
Last edited by Leynos - on 18 January 2022
At this point, I wouldn't be surprised to see Sony acquire both Capcom & Square Enix, or even looking towards Take Two. The rules of engagement have changed and Sony is certainly not ignoring that.
While they don't have the Microsoft war chest, Sony is certainly capable of making a few massive but strategic publisher acquisitions, to solidify their spot in the industry and to further adapt to industry consolidation.
I really don't think sony would make any move unless their hardware and software sales get affected, microsoft is aiming to be the netflix of videogames, the only reason of their adquisitions is in order to boost gamepass subscriptions not to sale more consoles, while sony's goal is just to sell more hardware and software.
MS crossed the line with this one. Heck, they leaped over it, Olympic record style.
MS isn't buying non Western devs/pubs for whatever reason, so it's kinda unlikely that SNY has to worry too much about losing those types of franchises to MS.
The way I'd solve this at SNY, is to buy Take Two. That alone is the only purchase they'd need, assuming MS doesn't later start acquiring big non Western devs/pubs.
Acti/Bliz had a 64B market cap, which is why MS paid somewhere between 64B-70B for them. You typically have to pay a bit of a premium over the market cap.
Take Two has a 17B market cap. SNY should be able to acquire them for $20B, but it would pretty much take everything they could throw at the deal to make it happen.
It would be worth it for GTA alone. The income, but more importantly, the mind share. GTA 6 (timed) exclusivity on PS5 would squash everything MS has done so far.
MS could go out and buy EA and UBI after this and it wouldn't change the market mind share. SNY would have it locked down for this gen.
SNY wouldn't even have to make it totally exclusive. Just timed exclusive to some degree, and a few free in game multiplayer perks for buying it on PS. Problem solved.
Imagine GTA 6, PSVR first person exclusivity.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
| mjk45 said: I was being facetious, and thinking about EA's much touted reputation over the years for being the worst Videogame company in the world until recently anyway. I would much prefer that this sort of aggressive buying stopped, but who knows there has to be a tipping point where Sony does a similar deal not in terms of outlay but in terms of numbers of IP's I expect that say that even capcom and square combined would cost considerably less. People talk about Take Two, I feel like but I could be wrong, that Take Two really dont have the large portfolio of Ip's like EA and Activision and after GTA RRD Bioshock and NBA2k it falls away with Borderlands only being published and historically their roi and profits doesn't seem that great compared to the number of games that those Ip's sell. My feeling is we may have to wait till after Spartacus is launched to get an indication into what direction Sony is heading. |
Take Two would be the best case scenario for Sony when it comes to publisher acquisitions. GTA, while not having annual releases like COD, is the largest video game IP outside of Mario, and GTA:O has been making bank for nearly a decade. Not to mention the RDR franchise which is arguably bigger than Call of Duty as well. It would swing the pendulum back in Sony's favor.
Sony would also get Bully, NBA2K, Bioshock, Sid Meier's Civilization, Borderlands, Max Payne, Manhunt, Midnight Club, among other smaller titles, to strengthen their IP catalog, which leads to a stronger Spartacus initiative, and provides a ton of multi media properties to adapt. And we can't forget about Zynga which fits Sony's push into mobile gaming.