Despite everything wrong with always-online, a ban on used games is not one of its cons. It might be there alongside the always-online requirement, but there's no inherent reason it needs to be.

Interesting to hear, thanks for your throughs.

Think so too, both is terrible.

Hey Teddy from Persona 4 :) The result of this poll is very interesting.

You say it!

Both are bad.

but what would be worse for you personally? That would be interesting for me :)

I hate always online.... hate it, so voted that.

The very idea of banning a used game (ei. can only install it once or such), is also horrible to me.
You cant do that, without logins and online checks ect.

So like,.... "banned used games" is basically a 2-in-1 (it only works with always online).

Always online is the worst.

I’m going to say always online is worse, but asking people to compare these options is like asking if you would rather eat cow shit or pig shit.

Neither would bother me I pretty much buy all my games digitally now haven't bought a used game in ages. Also even though I mostly play games offline I always have the console I use connected to the internet.

i understand, thanks for your thoughts :) interesting result, currently.

But shouldn't that be a matter of principle? ^^
And In some places there is no internet, these people have a big problem then xD

Used game for sure. I always sell meh games after I complete them. Sometimes even good ones too and buy again when incomplete edition is announced.

Always online is definetly the worse of the two.