By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Detroit Become Human PC - Native 4K vs Checkerboard Rendering on PS4 Pro, why native 4k is useless

Tagged games:

It look better with checkerboarding instead on native 4K

This is why 4k it's a waste of power, hell even PC now optimizing with DLSS and temporal  reconstruction.

PS4 pro started it and many people underestimate it LMAO. Now they understand that Cernies is truly Genius 



Around the Network

Don't think you watched the video propperly. They show checkerboard looks better than native with same number of pixels (1527p). Native 4k obviously looks better, which is clearly seen in this video.



Barkley said:

Don't think you watched the video propperly. They show checkerboard looks better than native with same number of pixels (1527p). Native 4k obviously looks better, which is clearly seen in this video.

Some aspect showed that checkerboard is better and have better anti aliasing on this video , on top of that many GPU offer DLSS which is checkerboard with machine learning. 

EDIT: On top of that you need to zoom in a lot to compared which is waste of effort and time, when you playing video games you will not notice especially if you are moving your character.



HollyGamer said:
Barkley said:

Don't think you watched the video propperly. They show checkerboard looks better than native with same number of pixels (1527p). Native 4k obviously looks better, which is clearly seen in this video.

Some aspect showed that checkerboard is better and have better anti aliasing on this video , on top of that many GPU offer DLSS which is checkerboard with machine learning. 

Give a timestamp. Skimmed through the video and saw 0 instances where native 4k was worse.



Barkley said:
HollyGamer said:

Some aspect showed that checkerboard is better and have better anti aliasing on this video , on top of that many GPU offer DLSS which is checkerboard with machine learning. 

Give a timestamp. Skimmed through the video and saw 0 instances where native 4k was worse.

03.30 



Around the Network
HollyGamer said:
Barkley said:

Give a timestamp. Skimmed through the video and saw 0 instances where native 4k was worse.

03.30 

Which is.... checkerboard compared to 1527p..... not native 4k...



Barkley said:
HollyGamer said:

Some aspect showed that checkerboard is better and have better anti aliasing on this video , on top of that many GPU offer DLSS which is checkerboard with machine learning. 

Give a timestamp. Skimmed through the video and saw 0 instances where native 4k was worse.



I thought his conclusion was Native 4k > Checker Boarding Trading blows with Native 1800p > Native 1527p?



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

HollyGamer said:
Barkley said:

Give a timestamp. Skimmed through the video and saw 0 instances where native 4k was worse.

Yes the native 4k looks better with more clearly visible details, as DF say in the video. lmao



Barkley said:
HollyGamer said:

Yes the native 4k looks better with more clearly visible details, as DF say in the video. lmao

what ever , but it's still win win solution with checkerboarded . especially for cheap consoles.