By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Unfixable Flaw Found in Thunderbolt Port - Unlocks any PC in Less Than 5 Minutes

 

Was there ever a need for Intels Thunderbolt port?

Nah, USB does everything it should. 6 100.00%
 
Yes, thunderbolt is a won... 0 0%
 
Total:6

https://www.techpowerup.com/266917/unfixable-flaw-found-in-thunderbolt-port-that-unlocks-any-pc-in-less-than-5-minutes

Dutch researcher from the Eindhoven University of Technology has found a new vulnerability in Thunderbolt port that allows attackers with physical access to unlock any PC running Windows or Linux kernel-based OS in less than 5 minutes. The researcher of the university called Björn Ruytenberg found a method which he calls Thunderspy, which can bypass the login screen of any PC. This attack requires physical access to the device, which is, of course, dangerous on its own if left with a person of knowledge. The Thunderbolt port is a fast protocol, and part of the reason why it is so fast is that it partially allows direct access to computer memory. And anything that can access memory directly is a potential vulnerability.

The Thunderspy attack relies on just that. There is a feature built into the Thunderbolt firmware called "Security Level", which disallows access to untrusted devices or even turns off Thunderbolt port altogether. This feature would make the port be a simple USB or display output. However, the researcher has found a way to alter the firmware setting of Thunderbolt control chip in a way so it allows any device to access the PC. This procedure is done without any trace and OS can not detect that there was a change. From there, the magic happens. Using an SPI (Serial Peripheral Interface) programmer with a SOP8 clip that connects the pins of the programmer device to the controller, the attacker just runs a script from there. This procedure requires around $400 worth of hardware. Intel already put some protection last year for the Thunderbolt port called Kernel Direct Memory Access Protection, but that feature isn't implemented on PCs manufactured before 2019. And even starting from 2019, not all PC manufacturers implement the feature, so there is a wide group of devices vulnerable to this unfixable attack.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uvSZA1F9os



Around the Network

I always felt that thunderbolt was a hugely expensive, unnessary port.... and now it even turns out it had a flaw like this in it the whole time too.

Thoughts? Surprised at another Intel related vulnerability?



Another day, another Intel vulnerability. Not surprising.

I do like the main idea of Thunderbolt. You have a thin and light laptop that has a good CPU with Thunderbolt ports and you can go to work or come home and connect to an External dock that has a beefy GPU and other things.

The problem is that you can generally get a better laptop that also has a beefy gpu which can also be fairly thin and light these days for less than the price of the weak laptop + thunderbolt dock + external GPU. So it's more of a rarity case I would say than anything.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Oh, Thunderbolt.... you never cease to disappoint.



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!

That's not a flaw but a feature.



In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.

Around the Network

I've seen easier backdoors in security relevant devices that were put there on purpose and are well documented.
It's like leaving the door wide open to the server room and then complaining that someone stole a server because of the "flaw" that the server was light enough to be carried away.

Not a single technology on this planet is safe if you allow undisturbed physical access to it.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Why make the life of hackers harder right? If you take the fun and challenge they won't bother.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

vivster said:
Not a single technology on this planet is safe if you allow undisturbed physical access to it.

True.



Thunderbolt defenders are probably, as we speak, coming up with ways they can spin this into something positive.



Ljink96 said:
Thunderbolt defenders are probably, as we speak, coming up with ways they can spin this into something positive.

Are there people who religiously defend a port? There's no way to spin this, this just sucks lol. Though I do like my notebook's Thunderbolt ports from a user experience. It's convenient to have one cable for my external monitor that also charges my notebook.