By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - 58.3% Plan To Buy A PS5 VS. 38.5% For XBX, According To IGN Poll

 

Which Of The Two Will You Be Buying?

PS5 Only 60 59.41%
 
XBX Only 18 17.82%
 
Both 8 7.92%
 
Sticking With Switch 14 13.86%
 
Sticking With PS4/XBO 1 0.99%
 
Total:101
DonFerrari said:
sales2099 said:

For the bolded. I can’t resist when I see these mashed up list warz lol.

GoT and Last of Us 2 is a PS4 title. Unless you referring to the inevitable remaster for PS5...but it won’t be a new game. Unlike LOU Remaster for PS4 that was enjoyed by millions of ex 360 gamers LOU2 won’t have that same benefit. The remaster will be played by a majority that all ready played the PS4 game releasing in 2 months. 

FF7 is a 3rd party times exclusive PS4 title...how does this help PS5 differentiate against Series X? (It doesn’t)

The other games you listed are A. Not announced and therefore B. No release date in sight. 

Officially, Series X has Halo Infinite, Hellblade 2, Project Mara, and Everwild coming to the platform. Officially PS5 has 0 exclusives announced so you are in no place to talk.

I could also say Fable reboot and Forza Motorsport 8, Forza Horizon 5, the Initiative new IP, Obsidians new title...but those aren’t officially announced and therefore I wont sink to the list level you gave. 

If you are going to count every crossgen title for XSX and you also think BC is great you can count all the PS4 titles that will release this year and the next as PS5 titles.

Or shall we remove the titles you listed since they will also be X1 titles?

You know the difference between cross gen and remasters. The main difference I am trying to convey is that cross gen is new. A remaster is a game that all ready released some time back. The hype and new feeling is gone and that’s everything on big exclusive titles in this industry. Being on X1 makes no difference to me, it’s not on PS5. 

I will accept PS4 remasters to be added to lists. But like I said they are old games with a fresh coat of paint....that’s supposed to make people bragging about their new console? Halo Infinite for example will have far more hype then a 2021 remaster of LOU2 because all that hype will be originally June 2020. 



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Around the Network
sales2099 said:
DonFerrari said:

If you are going to count every crossgen title for XSX and you also think BC is great you can count all the PS4 titles that will release this year and the next as PS5 titles.

Or shall we remove the titles you listed since they will also be X1 titles?

You know the difference between cross gen and remasters. The main difference I am trying to convey is that cross gen is new. A remaster is a game that all ready released some time back. The hype and new feeling is gone and that’s everything on big exclusive titles in this industry. Being on X1 makes no difference to me, it’s not on PS5. 

I will accept PS4 remasters to be added to lists. But like I said they are old games with a fresh coat of paint....that’s supposed to make people bragging about their new console? Halo Infinite for example will have far more hype then a 2021 remaster of LOU2 because all that hype will be originally June 2020. 

Haven't said anything about remasters. I said that with BC a game released this year for PS4 or a game crossgen on X1 and XSX for customers would have very little difference, reason why many have said the crossgen on MS may not be a good thing for HW sales.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

sales2099 said:
thismeintiel said:

There's no denying it, B/C is a great feature to have, and I said as much when MS announced B/C for XBO.  Personally, I wish Sony had at least done full PS1 B/C for PS4, since I have a ton of them on PSN.  However, considering this is a sales website, most here are debating things in terms of what will push sales and what won't.  It's just a fact that in the grand scheme of things, B/C does little to push sales.  It's most effective at the beginning of a gen, not 2 years into one.  And may be a little more important this time, since digital libraries have grown exponentially.

You do realize that the PS3 outsold the 360 every year of last gen, save two, right?  So, your earlier comment about 360 being more relevant for most of the gen doesn't hold water.  Unless you're talking about globally in the US.  There's no way around it, the 360 lost last gen.  Sure, it wasn't by much, but it still lost.  It helps that Sony practically handed them nearly half the gen.  Still couldn't pull that W card, though.

Lol, this false narrative, again?  I know it was calculated that this gen the average wait time between MS's announcements to releases was longer than Sony's.

It seems that MS is doing it, again.  They announced Hellblade 2 in Dec '19, saying it was very early in development.  We'll see how long that takes to come out.

Why yes I did realize that. That’s what happens when one sells in Japan and the other doesn’t. Still doesn’t change my opinion that Ps3 was last place until September 2013, two months before the next gen began. I’d say both sides have reasons to be happy with that gen, think that’s fair to say. 

Lol your Xbox examples don’t hold a candle to the number of games Sony announced years out that we’re on every list warz for years. Remember “Final fantasy versus 13”?, hell FF7 remake was announced what five years ago? Last Guardian rings a bell too, boy that was a long wait. GT5 released in 2010 and ever since that 2006 demo released that was on list wars for 4 years. 

That’s just off the top of my head. Xbox is no stranger to years away announcements, but Sony has been king for generations. But more importantly....why do you take this as a negative? It literally gives fans hype and inflates their list wars for years. It’s only negative for someone like me. 

Considering it was close, I will agree.

You were the one portraying announcing games more than 2 years in advance as a negative.  "Ya I’m not looking forward to hearing about games that won’t be out for 3+ years and will be on every list wars debate until they release."  And then went on to imply that MS doesn't do that, with the max being 2 years from release, which is a complete lie.  Let's just take a look at this gen for notable examples.

E3 2013
Below - Released Dec 2018 (~5 1/2 years later)
Halo 5 - Released Oct 2015 (~2 1/3 years later)
Quantum Break - Released Apr 2016 (~2 3/4 years later)

E3 2014
Crackdown 3 - Released Feb 2019 (~4 2/3 years later)
Fable Legends - Cancelled in 2016
Phantom Dust Remake - Released May 2017, as just a remaster (~3 years later)
Scalebound - Cancelled in 2017

E3 2015
Ashen - Released Dec 2018 (3 1/2 years later)
Cuphead - Released Sep 2017 (2 1/4 years later)
Sea of Thieves - Released Mar 2018 (2 3/4 years later)

E3 2017
Ori and the Will of the Wisps - Released Mar 2020 (2 3/4 years later)

E3 2018
Battletoads - TBD (It will be 2 years in June)
Halo: Infinite - Q4 2020 (It will be 2 1/2 years later)

So, yea, MS has definitely taken advantage of hyping games more than 2 years out, and some that never see the light of day.  Personally, I have no problem with it.  What I do have a problem with is Xbox diehards pushing the false narrative that Sony is the only one who does it, and therefore gets some kind of unfair advantage for doing so.



DonFerrari said:
sales2099 said:

You know the difference between cross gen and remasters. The main difference I am trying to convey is that cross gen is new. A remaster is a game that all ready released some time back. The hype and new feeling is gone and that’s everything on big exclusive titles in this industry. Being on X1 makes no difference to me, it’s not on PS5. 

I will accept PS4 remasters to be added to lists. But like I said they are old games with a fresh coat of paint....that’s supposed to make people bragging about their new console? Halo Infinite for example will have far more hype then a 2021 remaster of LOU2 because all that hype will be originally June 2020. 

Haven't said anything about remasters. I said that with BC a game released this year for PS4 or a game crossgen on X1 and XSX for customers would have very little difference, reason why many have said the crossgen on MS may not be a good thing for HW sales.

Ok I’m sorry I didn’t give you a formal apology for saying only core gamers care about BC. But we both agree BC is a niche, a nice thing to have. But like I said, BC or remaster the game won’t have that new hype feeling every Xbox exclusive will have. 

This convo going somewhere else entirely. Not the topic to say why cross gen won’t hurt next gen hardware much. Firstly being late adopters wouldn’t upgrade at launch regardless, might as well make money from the X1 version with them. 

But my original reason for making that post was the list warz.  The post was clearly trying to get pumped for upcoming PS5 releases and he ends up listing PS4 2020 titles and worse, unannounced PS5 titles from his wish list. I was merely listing what’s official and coming to Series X. I don’t care the X1 is getting a version, I’m talking Series X v PS5. 



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

thismeintiel said:
sales2099 said:

Why yes I did realize that. That’s what happens when one sells in Japan and the other doesn’t. Still doesn’t change my opinion that Ps3 was last place until September 2013, two months before the next gen began. I’d say both sides have reasons to be happy with that gen, think that’s fair to say. 

Lol your Xbox examples don’t hold a candle to the number of games Sony announced years out that we’re on every list warz for years. Remember “Final fantasy versus 13”?, hell FF7 remake was announced what five years ago? Last Guardian rings a bell too, boy that was a long wait. GT5 released in 2010 and ever since that 2006 demo released that was on list wars for 4 years. 

That’s just off the top of my head. Xbox is no stranger to years away announcements, but Sony has been king for generations. But more importantly....why do you take this as a negative? It literally gives fans hype and inflates their list wars for years. It’s only negative for someone like me. 

Considering it was close, I will agree.

You were the one portraying announcing games more than 2 years in advance as a negative.  "Ya I’m not looking forward to hearing about games that won’t be out for 3+ years and will be on every list wars debate until they release."  And then went on to imply that MS doesn't do that, with the max being 2 years from release, which is a complete lie.  Let's just take a look at this gen for notable examples.

E3 2013
Below - Released Dec 2018 (~5 1/2 years later)
Halo 5 - Released Oct 2015 (~2 1/3 years later)
Quantum Break - Released Apr 2016 (~2 3/4 years later)

E3 2014
Crackdown 3 - Released Feb 2019 (~4 2/3 years later)
Fable Legends - Cancelled in 2016
Phantom Dust Remake - Released May 2017, as just a remaster (~3 years later)
Scalebound - Cancelled in 2017

E3 2015
Ashen - Released Dec 2018 (3 1/2 years later)
Cuphead - Released Sep 2017 (2 1/4 years later)
Sea of Thieves - Released Mar 2018 (2 3/4 years later)

E3 2017
Ori and the Will of the Wisps - Released Mar 2020 (2 3/4 years later)

E3 2018
Battletoads - TBD (It will be 2 years in June)
Halo: Infinite - Q4 2020 (It will be 2 1/2 years later)

So, yea, MS has definitely taken advantage of hyping games more than 2 years out, and some that never see the light of day.  Personally, I have no problem with it.  What I do have a problem with is Xbox diehards pushing the false narrative that Sony is the only one who does it, and therefore gets some kind of unfair advantage for doing so.

It’s a negative for me because I have to deal with smug fans making lists full of games that won’t be released for years. “My list is bigger then yours” stuff that one tends to see on gaming sites. It’s positive for fans who can do that. Sure it’s eye rolling and cheap to list extremely early announced titles as list fodder but if that were MS you damn right I’d do the same thing ;)

See the difference is that Xbox fans didn’t push those games you listed every 2 days. Which Xbox fan is gonna push Crackdown 3 on a list knowing how poor 2 was received? That’s my intangible difference...it’s the pushing of said games.

How many Xbox fans you see bragging about Ashen or Battletoads compared to PS fans listing Spiderman 2, Horizon Zero Dawn 2, God of War 2...games that aren’t even announced yet I see them on lists. That’s my point

Last edited by sales2099 - on 01 April 2020

Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Around the Network
sales2099 said:
thismeintiel said:

Considering it was close, I will agree.

You were the one portraying announcing games more than 2 years in advance as a negative.  "Ya I’m not looking forward to hearing about games that won’t be out for 3+ years and will be on every list wars debate until they release."  And then went on to imply that MS doesn't do that, with the max being 2 years from release, which is a complete lie.  Let's just take a look at this gen for notable examples.

E3 2013
Below - Released Dec 2018 (~5 1/2 years later)
Halo 5 - Released Oct 2015 (~2 1/3 years later)
Quantum Break - Released Apr 2016 (~2 3/4 years later)

E3 2014
Crackdown 3 - Released Feb 2019 (~4 2/3 years later)
Fable Legends - Cancelled in 2016
Phantom Dust Remake - Released May 2017, as just a remaster (~3 years later)
Scalebound - Cancelled in 2017

E3 2015
Ashen - Released Dec 2018 (3 1/2 years later)
Cuphead - Released Sep 2017 (2 1/4 years later)
Sea of Thieves - Released Mar 2018 (2 3/4 years later)

E3 2017
Ori and the Will of the Wisps - Released Mar 2020 (2 3/4 years later)

E3 2018
Battletoads - TBD (It will be 2 years in June)
Halo: Infinite - Q4 2020 (It will be 2 1/2 years later)

So, yea, MS has definitely taken advantage of hyping games more than 2 years out, and some that never see the light of day.  Personally, I have no problem with it.  What I do have a problem with is Xbox diehards pushing the false narrative that Sony is the only one who does it, and therefore gets some kind of unfair advantage for doing so.

It’s a negative for me because I have to deal with smug fans making lists full of games that won’t be released for years. “My list is bigger then yours” stuff that one tends to see on gaming sites. It’s positive for fans who can do that. Sure it’s eye rolling and cheap to list extremely early announced titles as list fodder but if that were MS you damn right I’d do the same thing ;)

See the difference is that Xbox fans didn’t push those games you listed every 2 days. Which Xbox fan is gonna push Crackdown 3 on a list knowing how poor 2 was received? That’s my intangible difference...it’s the pushing of said games.

How many Xbox fans you see bragging about Ashen or Battletoads compared to PS fans listing Spiderman 2, Horizon Zero Dawn 2, God of War 2...games that aren’t even announced yet I see them on lists. That’s my point

It didn't stop Xbox fans from pushing those games on this very site with their lists, including Crackdown 3.  And Battletoads was hyped when it was first announced, though it kinda died down once the gameplay footage was shown.  Still, the fact remains, MS does the exact same thing.  I guess if you want to have bigger, and more, exclusives, you'll have to just switch to PS5.



sales2099 said:
DonFerrari said:

Haven't said anything about remasters. I said that with BC a game released this year for PS4 or a game crossgen on X1 and XSX for customers would have very little difference, reason why many have said the crossgen on MS may not be a good thing for HW sales.

Ok I’m sorry I didn’t give you a formal apology for saying only core gamers care about BC. But we both agree BC is a niche, a nice thing to have. But like I said, BC or remaster the game won’t have that new hype feeling every Xbox exclusive will have. 

This convo going somewhere else entirely. Not the topic to say why cross gen won’t hurt next gen hardware much. Firstly being late adopters wouldn’t upgrade at launch regardless, might as well make money from the X1 version with them. 

But my original reason for making that post was the list warz.  The post was clearly trying to get pumped for upcoming PS5 releases and he ends up listing PS4 2020 titles and worse, unannounced PS5 titles from his wish list. I was merely listing what’s official and coming to Series X. I don’t care the X1 is getting a version, I’m talking Series X v PS5. 

The games releasing 2020 on PS4 will be immediately available on PS5 and you have no idea of how they will be enhanced for it. Still crossgen also won't be exclusive on XSX or will take the uptmost advantage of the HW.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

sales2099 said:
thismeintiel said:

Considering it was close, I will agree.

You were the one portraying announcing games more than 2 years in advance as a negative.  "Ya I’m not looking forward to hearing about games that won’t be out for 3+ years and will be on every list wars debate until they release."  And then went on to imply that MS doesn't do that, with the max being 2 years from release, which is a complete lie.  Let's just take a look at this gen for notable examples.

E3 2013
Below - Released Dec 2018 (~5 1/2 years later)
Halo 5 - Released Oct 2015 (~2 1/3 years later)
Quantum Break - Released Apr 2016 (~2 3/4 years later)

E3 2014
Crackdown 3 - Released Feb 2019 (~4 2/3 years later)
Fable Legends - Cancelled in 2016
Phantom Dust Remake - Released May 2017, as just a remaster (~3 years later)
Scalebound - Cancelled in 2017

E3 2015
Ashen - Released Dec 2018 (3 1/2 years later)
Cuphead - Released Sep 2017 (2 1/4 years later)
Sea of Thieves - Released Mar 2018 (2 3/4 years later)

E3 2017
Ori and the Will of the Wisps - Released Mar 2020 (2 3/4 years later)

E3 2018
Battletoads - TBD (It will be 2 years in June)
Halo: Infinite - Q4 2020 (It will be 2 1/2 years later)

So, yea, MS has definitely taken advantage of hyping games more than 2 years out, and some that never see the light of day.  Personally, I have no problem with it.  What I do have a problem with is Xbox diehards pushing the false narrative that Sony is the only one who does it, and therefore gets some kind of unfair advantage for doing so.

It’s a negative for me because I have to deal with smug fans making lists full of games that won’t be released for years. “My list is bigger then yours” stuff that one tends to see on gaming sites. It’s positive for fans who can do that. Sure it’s eye rolling and cheap to list extremely early announced titles as list fodder but if that were MS you damn right I’d do the same thing ;)

See the difference is that Xbox fans didn’t push those games you listed every 2 days. Which Xbox fan is gonna push Crackdown 3 on a list knowing how poor 2 was received? That’s my intangible difference...it’s the pushing of said games.

How many Xbox fans you see bragging about Ashen or Battletoads compared to PS fans listing Spiderman 2, Horizon Zero Dawn 2, God of War 2...games that aren’t even announced yet I see them on lists. That’s my point

Your point is that Xbox fans didn't push a list because they didn't had any game releasing to be proud of. I can agree.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

thismeintiel said:
RolStoppable said:

As far as I know, Gamespot is the major go-to website for Xbox gamers while IGN's visitors skew towards PS, so primarily US traffic doesn't automatically translate to an Xbox bias in the sample. You'd have to look at previous PS vs. Xbox polls of any kind on IGN in order to determine the bias in the sample because console sales aren't going to work.

If you then found out that, for example, a 70:30 ratio in favor of PS is the norm, then this current poll would show a loss in mindshare for PS. Conversely, if the usual ratio is 50:50, then the current poll would show an increase in mindshare for PS.

I saw two early IGN polls showing PS4 vs XBO.  But, there is no way to compare them really.  The first one had PS4 at 74.8%.  It was released before they launched and occurred around E3, when many gamers, including some Xbox diehards, were revolting against the Xbox brand with its DRM and focus on TV.  The second was taken shortly after launch, without XBO's DRM, but it was still the weaker HW and cost $100 more.  PS4 dropped to 68% in that poll. 

In this poll, we have Xbox firing on all cylinders.  It has the more powerful HW and according to many, it has been on point with its messaging and reveal.  Sony, on the other hand, has the slightly weaker HW and according to many, hasn't been very good with its messaging and reveal.  Still, the PS5 is winning the poll easily.

Where are you getting this poor messaging thing? Certainly not on VGC. Sony has the weaker hardware and has successfully convinced half of this site of the opposite? Their messaging/marketing has been genius thus far.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

LudicrousSpeed said:

victor83fernandes said:

1 - So they should pu tin the title USA poll

2 - Xbox one X has advantages but ps5 too, this time ps5 is backwards compatible with ps4, and most people would like to play their library going forward, most people have ps4 so logic tells me those people will be moving to ps5

Other disadvantage of xbox series X is no exclusives for 2 years

One more disadvantage is its coming after xbox one, a failure, the xbox one was coming after 360, a success, so there was more xbox fans back then.

One more disadvantage this time all xbox games are on PC, unlike previous generations.

This leads me to believe the series X will do worse than xbox One.

Stronger first party? What are you talking about? All xbox games will be on PC and xbox One, there are no first party exclusives at all, have you been following the news?

And do you honestly think it can compete with Horizon Zero dawn 2, spiderman 2, last of us 2, Ghost of tsushima, final fantasy 7 remake? Wake up.

Want more? i can keep this all day, xbox series X will cost more than xbox one at launch, surely more than ps5.

Seems pretty obvious to me that person was saying XSX will have stronger first party support than Xbone did. Which of course, it will. Also since when is FF7R first party or exclusive?

Also not related to your post but of course now that PS5 has BC its great and just totes different than last gen when Xbox had it. Just like paid online play, releasing games on PC, TFlops, etc etc. As they say, war never changes 😆

 - xbox one had great first party support at launch, just like xbox 360, the problem is microsoft doesn't keep up and abandons the console after a couple years, people know this. Look at Sony still supporting their console late in the generation just like they did with ps3, people also know this

- FF7 remake is console exclusive on ps4/ps5 for a year, as in, available on ps5 at launch day, but not on xbox

- PS5 having BC is big, if the ps4 had ps3 BC it would have sold way more and xbox way less. The gap would be wider. And that's my point.

- I have no idea what you are on with the paid online, both ps4 and xbox one had paid online.

- TFlops doesn't matter as much, because the faster SSD of the ps5 will shorten the gap, then again people do not care much for a little power difference, the original Xbox was more powerful than ps2, it didn't matter, games matter the most.