Them since you are talking to someone that done the technical comparison and isn't talking about personal taste you know you are wrong right?

I can't comment on the technical differences, as that's above my pay grade.  But, I played both of them on PS4 Pro, and I was much more impressed by RDR2.  TLOU2 is a beautiful game, probably my number 2.  But, the massive, beautiful world that RDR2 gave us is just way cooler than the relatively linear areas of TLOU2.  

I also think TLOU2 gets some bump in gamers' minds from the recency effect.  It's top of mind, whereas RDR2 is stuck back in the memory bank.  

I find the foliage and weather effects of TLOU2 superb, maybe the best I've seen, but I think character details and animations (especially face animation) are below of what we saw in DS, RDR2, and Gears 5.

And we must take into account the fact that DS and RDR2 are fully open-world, and that Gears 5 runs at 60fps.

Them since you are talking to someone that done the technical comparison and isn't talking about personal taste you know you are wrong right?

But then again we go for personal preferences instead of technical achievements.

I prefer the aesthetic of Ghost of Tsushima, and think that if it had the same size studio and talent of ND it would be just beyond belief. But I can easily recognize that on the technical side TLOU2 was leaps and bounds ahead of GoT when it comes to everything graphics (perhaps only particle effects on GoT was more proeminent).

And if he was saying that RDR2 on PC looked better I could conceed, but when looking both on PS4 that isn't the case. The extra optimization from single platform plus the strong capabilities of ND that is unmatched makes it a comparison that TLOU2 doesn't lose, to the point of being basically the only game this gen on PS4Pro that could be mistaken for and early next gen title.

That's not how opinion on subjective stuff like art works.  It's not possible for me to be wrong that I find RDR2 more impressive.  

It may well be the case the TLOU2 is a more exceptional technical achievement. In some sense that is less subjective, since some aspects of that can be expressed in numbers.  But, the overall graphical awesomeness of a game is always going to be a matter of opinion. 

Well, I can only tell you that when you look at videos comparing the facial animations of those games you can clearly see that TLOU2 characters look more "stiff" compared to the others. I mean, it still looks great, but that's one area where it falls behind.

When you discuss technical it isn't subjective at all. You liking or thinking more impressive as opinion is your right, but then opinion isn't object of discussion so it is pointless. And you yourself said you don't understand the technical part, so not sure why you are bothering with it.

And nope it isn't a matter of opinion. Unless you want to join that silly group that used to say Wii titles were more graphically impressive because of "art direction".

Facial animation and animation in general was among the most praised aspects of TLOU2.

Well, I did not say they were bad (I actually said they still look great), but when you compare them side by side with the others, you can see the difference.