Ryuu96 said:
If Infinite is actually good then no, I strongly disagree that they need the boot cause they took 3 months extra to get Co-op into the game. Do they need some management sorting? Likely. Do we need to dump the entire studio? No. The Multiplayer was universally praised, the Art-Style is loved, Graphics have significantly improved with the extra time. The remaining unknowns are Story and Content and I don't think we should kick an entire studio off a game because they didn't get every single Halo feature in on launch. They can be made more efficient without booting the entire studio off the series. More to the point, folk love saying that Halo should be given to someone else as if it's something simple, first you'd have to find a suitable studio for it, secondly they'd have to accept, thirdly, Halo is a massive IP and is a huge amount of pressure for any studio, the amount of content that Halo is expected to have in launch far exceeds most games of its kind, CoD and Battlefield have in the past dumped their entire Campaign modes! Lol. Joe Staten is there, a Veteran of Halo, if we can't trust him to steer the ship right then who can we trust? Lol. Maybe start ANOTHER studio from scratch? But that's a whole massive headache when you could just as easily clean up 343 from the inside. I say wait until launch, if it's good then awesome, if it's bad then think about drastic measures, but I want to actually give Joe Staten more of a chance because if he can't sort things then God knows who can. |
I think another option can be is to let 343i work on just a multiplayer and make someone else handle the campaign part of Halo. If Infinite doesn't turn out to be good.