shikamaru317 said:
EspadaGrim said:
Such a shame that a Company that has a very strong 1st party has to resort to Money-Hatting not only games but franchises that are already well known.
if MS were the ones doing this you would already know the reaction.
|
Yep, we saw the reaction when MS moneyhatted Rise of the Tomb Raider. They got a ton of hate for that from PS fans. Afterwards Phil said they he wouldn't moneyhat big 3rd party games from established franchises (only new IP's) and so far he kept his word on that, Rise of the Tomb Raider was his last big 3rd party moneyhat. Sony could have been nice and followed suit, but instead they are still tossing money at 3rd party devs to get established franchises as timed exclusives.
If Sony keeps this moneyhatting up, Phil is going to have to walk back the nice guy routine, or else MS won't even be able to win back it's two strongest markets, the US and UK, let alone come anywhere near close to competing with PS on a worldwide scale. Phil is simply going to have to start moneyhatting 3rd parties as well if this keeps up.
|
Moneyhatting is easy to do when you're the popular player in the market. Since you have a majority market share, that majority is either going to be pleased about your dealings, or indifferent to them. On top of that, having certain big titles as timed or full exclusives as a result of these deals will help keep you as the popular choice in the market. And let's not forget of course, that owning a majority market share also lends itself to making said deals cheaper, because the potential loss you're compensating developers/publishers for is far smaller than keeping something off the system of the market leader.
In contrast, all the opposite is true for the underdog, and even if they have the capital to engage in eye for eye battle, they'll upset more people than not, because they're by default inconveniencing more people.