shikamaru317 said:
It's amazing the lengths that some people will go to try and make Sony look good. Seems like so many of the gaming sites are buying into this PS5 secret-sauce rumor and trying to prop up PS5 as being closer to XSX than it actually is. I legit saw an article yesterday, on a gaming site, where they tried to claim that the Xbox Series X actually has less tflops usable for graphics than PS5, because the XSX doesn't have a dedicated audio chipset and 20% of GPU resources will need to be wasted on audio processing *faceplam*. That is wrong on 2 levels, 1. XSX does have a dedicated audio chipset and audio developers are praising that decision, and 2. even if XSX didn't have a dedicated audio chipset, audio would run off the CPU, not the GPU. Thankfully, the tech sites, unlike the gaming sites, don't seem to be Sony biased and aren't buying into Sony's claim that their smaller GPU with higher clocks approach is better than Microsoft's larger GPU with slower clocks approach. Here is an article where Notebook Check shuts down those claims, noting that an 18% overclock on a Navi 1 GPU only offer 5-7% better framerate: https://www.notebookcheck.net/No-the-PS5-won-t-offer-anywhere-near-the-graphics-performance-of-Xbox-Series-X-Navi-benchmarks-prove-it.458625.0.html Digital Foundry has also been shutting down these PS5 secret sauce people:
|
It’ll show in the multiplats. Resolution/FPS....it will be nice to be on the winning side of comparisons for a change lol