oh yeah, I do. I hate the fact that I have to keep saying this to people who don't get it. 

I'm apolitical, because politics... it is complex. Not in the sense that politics itself is complex. Anyway.

When i look at the BLM logo i don't see an organisation brought into existence primarily to fight racism, support black communities and all that. What i see is a political movement in the extreme left of the political spectrum. I very much dislike extrem-ism, no matter politics, religion, right, left, christian, muslim, scientology. I dislike the subversive and tolliterian nature.

The raised fist is a commonly used symbol amongst freedom, human rights movements aso, true. Keep digging. 

From the BLM website:

"We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/

"Marxist theory on family established the revolutionary ideal for the Soviet state and influenced state policy concerning family in varying degrees throughout the history of the country. The principals are: The nuclear family unit is an economic arrangement structured to maintain the ideological functions of Capitalism. The family unit perpetuates class inequality through the transfer of private property through inheritance. Following the abolition of private property, the bourgeois family will cease to exist and the union of individuals will become a “purely private affair”. The Soviet state’s first code on marriage and family was written in 1918 and enacted a series of trans-formative laws designed to bring the Soviet family closer in line with Marxist theory."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_in_the_Soviet_Union#Bolshevik_vision_of_the_family

I'm in a bit of pickle here. As a colored person i'm supposed to be automatically supportive of this extreme-left ideology? That's kinda racist? That's not all. There is more to this.

I really don't want to participate in politcal debates, especially not the one going on right now. I can't help it, when i observe what's going on in the (under)world the politics squabble becomes distant chatter in the background.

Seriously? He plays dumb, then asks if you're sick of correcting him? What game is this gentleman playing here? 

Exactly. It's not an act.

A riot is also the language of someone who has lost an argument, a pogrom or Kristallnacht participant, or just someone who wants to see the world burn.

For a law enforcement officer out on foot (or for almost anyone actually), a building going up in flames for "truth and justice" looks no different than a building going up in flames because "fuck everything". What is clear is someone is setting a building on fire and people could be in that building trapped beneath flames or choking on smoke and violent crowds about the building need to be cleared away so that firefighters can safely put the fire out.

I appreciate the reverend's poetic words but I find them more poetic than substantive.

I see no difference in the operations of the press at this point. They're still free to say whatever the hell they want despite it being morally corrupt at times. They are still more focused on taking down Trump and shoving their narrative. In fact, I find the whole Russia investigation fiasco that the mainstream media and Democrats propagated to be the biggest waste of time and tax payer's money.

Trump did fuck up to a degree but how can you not see the bullshit when the democrats and media would rather counter Trump than be reasonable. Trump's China travel ban was met with criticism by Pelosi and the media by saying it's another racist move with ulterior motives of anti-immigration. Pelosi even went as far as to go to Chinatown in San Francisco to show her defiance and demonstrate her "solidarity" to the Chinese American community by urging people to support these local businesses. A few days later, people are now getting stuck at home. A few weeks later, Pelosi is back to running her mouth at every chance she can.

Here's another one. Trump wanted to take down CHAZ as soon as possible but the Mayor and the city council told Trump to fuck off. I cannot stress enough how glad I am that he did back off. We got to see the mayor sing praises about CHAZ in the media calling it a "summer of love". Not too long people are getting assaulted, robbed and killed. The local government decided to draw the line and dismantle CHAZ. Now she has a class action lawsuit against her for mishandling the whole thing which resulted in costly damages to property. The cherry on top of this whole fiasco is that the retards at CHAZ also want her out because they got tear gassed. Now, both sides hate her.

If you still say that this isn't lunacy that is being displayed then I don't know what is. The whole thing is a a bad case of the pot calling the kettle black. Except, I find the other one to be a little bit more deranged than the other.

Oh and I just found this article a while ago. Something extra to toss in for the comedy.

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/seattle-city-council-president-addresses-protests-targeting-council-members-houses/

How's about a name change to 'Black Lives Also Matter'?

That's the thing. It doesn't matter how you interpret the riots. It doesn't matter whether you think the actions were good or bad or just or unjust, just like it doesn't matter what your moral take is on a tsunami. Riots like this exist as a part of a cause/effect chain. There is simply no value in moralizing about the effect. If you wish to prevent this type of thing happening in the future, you would be much better served by fighting the cause.

Why do black lives need to exist in relation to other lives? The point of the movement is simply to state exactly what it says: Black Lives matter. It shouldn't need to be relative, it shouldn't need to be justified, it shouldn't need to be compared to other lives. 

Right! We arrest these arsonists so that they don't set any more fires in the future!

That is again fighting the symptom, not the cause. We will continue to wind up in these situations until we actually fix the broken systems which led to these protests. Plus, as a tiny little bonus, we will also not have a broken criminal justice system, which is good I guess.

Why?  You obviously know it's implied so you're playing either ignorance or instigation. 

Bullshit.  You know what it means and yet you still trot out 'all lives matter' and 'black lives matter also'.  If you understand the message, then it doesn't need tweaking just not appease you.

In fact, this exemplifies the whole problem.  Even during a movement to better their lives you want to turn it around to be about you and change it up just to make you feel better.

And do you honestly think that would have made a damn bit of difference if the movement was called 'black lives matter also'?  Hell no.  We'd just have the counter-protest of 'white lives matter also'.