EricHiggin on 14 March 2019
Geralt99 said: Imagine a game with "sony interactive entertainment presents" and then rockstar games logo appearing on screen. Gives me chills just thinking about it. But then again , i don't see this being true. If it is , then i would be pleasently surprised. |
Imagine seeing that on your next gen XB. How would MS be able to say no to those franchises on their platform? Can you imagine the outrage by their customers? While PS could keep them entirely exclusive, if they have to pay an arm and a leg for Take Two, why not profit off the competition to help pay it off, while spreading the PS brand and using those specific Take Two titles as marketing themselves? What better way to easily and directly show your competitors customers what kind of gaming experience PS offers? Both will draw some players to the PS ecosystem, but which one is overall the better choice is hard to say.
UltimateGamer1982 said: Confirmed not happening. Lock this one up. |
Well if SNY hasn't made the deal yet then that statement wouldn't be false, because technically they wouldn't really know if the deal will close or not for sure.
There "may be truth" that SNY could potentially acquire Take Two.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.