Asking to be able to read a report is intellectually honest. None of the articles even cited the names of the economists who were questioned. That's something the report will have. Now you asking me to blindly believe a report that I can't even read is intellectually dishonest.

I guess I was just trying to let you know that it reflects poorly back on you when you say things like that.

I'm not here to coddle anyone. If speaking truth and debating with facts reflects poorly on me, then so be it.

I would blame that on the media. When 90% of those are cherry picking situations and blowing them out of proportion. Such as when asked about MS13, he calls them animals. And then to this day still, the media is not only loudly yelling that Trump called all immigrants animals, but they also have rolled out a frighteningly large number of articles and shows defending and trying to downplay the MS13 gang as not bad people.

So, yes, half the country would ignore any bad things the press says about Trump. Not because they don't care about those bad things, but because they don't trust the press enough to believe that Trump said or did those things.

Also most of those things the voters all knew about when voting him in. Do you think anyone gives a flying fuck he slept with a porn star? Or the sexual assault (he says women let him do whatever cause he is famous). While disguisting, not something we didn't all assume is true of him and ALL of famous people. Also a bit hypocritical when many of the hugely outspoken people of him end up having way worse sexual assault stuff in their closet.

I heard someone say something once about Oprah and her running for office. They said she is this angel in a white suit, and if she ran for politics, you would have people throwing mud at her left and right. That mud is super distinguishable on her prestine white suit. Thus makes sense why she would not run. She is loved by all right now. That would not be true the second she put her name in the hat.

On the other hand you have Trump. He is wearing a suit made out of mud. Thus it doesn't matter how much shit you throw at him.

I just don't think you believe me when I say it reflects poorly on you. I get the impression that you think others read those messages and are impressed with you. And maybe they are. Maybe it's an age thing, of which now I'm curious. Perhaps I'll explore this further. I hope you don't mind if I use some of your work for a thesis I'm working on?

lol, I'm just messing with you. Let's keep our middle fingers up, my man. Fuck Trump!

Edit: Check your friend requests. ;)

It's intellectually dishonest to not look at the links, not read them or look at their sources and not think you're wrong. I provided sources to back up what I said. I provided what was asked. You're not gonna move the goal post to something new every time I meet it. 

What a cop out. Plenty of buts indeed. Articles typically come with sources/links. You didn't look at anything.

Watch out, boys, RaptorChrist is on Team Megiddo!

uh you didn't

to reiterate all you've done is compare ~8 years to ~1.5 then pretend that doing so makes you good at math

if you wanted to be consistent with your argument then you'd compare the first ~1.5 years for both presidents... obviously you can't so instead you've resorted to this nonsensical argument