You would really want to compare phone librarie with Nintendo and 3rd party Switch library!? :D

Of Course I talking about quality of titles not numbers of titles.

This is really a useless comparison (and kinda sad to compare a console to a phone). Phones are meant to do way more than running games, while the Switch is specifically meant to run games. Of course a gaming console version of Fortnite is gonna look more polished even at 1/3 of the price of the newest phone. Why do you think a PC that is able to run games at PS4-like quality is way more expensive than a PS4? Compare your refigerator with the Switch while you're at it.

I'm having a hard time believing this.

There aren't any. Asphalt 9, the best looking racing game on mobiles, is behind Gran Turismo 6 and Forza Motorsport 4, PS3 and Xbox 360 games in terms of detail while running at half the framerate of those games, but with better post processing and higher resolution. They are nowhere near even cross gen racing games on PS4.

touch controls will always be a no go for me. most annoying thing to use.

if i were to play fortnite, switch would be the way to go for me in this thread.

My phone has bluetooth.

The way you say it makes the Phone/PC seem inferior in some way, despite being able to take on multiple tasks.

Phones is like PC , it runs everything but need extra thing to run simple thing, unlike dedicated system like consoles or handled , it's primary function is only to play games, so it doesn't need to be as expensive as Smart Phones.

Quality is obviously subjective and will thus differ depending on individual.

With that in mind... The Switch's API and OS is obviously more efficient than what Android has, so will obviously retain a small advantage over current phones, but that will all end very soon.

Well, how much did your phone cost? A Samsung Galaxy S9+ costs more than THREE times the price of a Switch. An article like this has already cropped up before, when the OP compared the Switch to an iPhone X of all things.