I am a Muslim so at all is a  pretty low bar for me and I think I meet that requirement

Yeah left wingers call themselves liberals. Words don’t mean shit anymore. I am liberal, not you lol. I’m taking my shit back. 

As I already mentioned the also had the word worker in their official name but they weren't pro worker.  As soon as they gained power they outlawed all unions, order a wage freeze and made worker strikes illegal not something I would call being pro worker.    

Of course they don't. They'd vote against Christ himself and declare him the anti-Christ if he appeared today. Forget the alt-right though, even most right-wing actual Christians don't know much about Christian theology. There are still theocrats among them though. They know what confirms their narrative, and they want to apply that to the government, so that only Christian identifying men can hold positions, and Christianity would be enforced. In their ultimate dream, it's convert or be exiled (or killed). Obey the Christian laws or be jailed for your sins. That's theocracy, even if every single policy isn't grounded in doctrine, and in fact the religion explicitly goes against everything they'd like to do. Such is how it goes with theocrats.

lmao it still amazes me that people do not understand that democracy often leads to tyranny

tell me something if the people of a society are stupid and vote away their rights collectively,

for example, the right to free speech, the right to protect themselves, the right to associate in groups etc etc etc

what would that result in?

"Just because they call themselves something, doesn't mean they are."

correct, but if someone calls themselves something and their actions or policies align with their stated title then i'd have to be pretty stupid to not acknowledge that right?

which is what happens again and again and again

rely on democracy and misinformation to have people vote themselves into dependency on government and then exploit the people through that dependency

what you do not understand is that they obtain power with a mask of bringing about "equality" or "fairness" or "equity" or whatever

that does not mean that social policies are not needed... of course they are but within reason... the minute you get to stating that all people need to have the same outcomes across various criteria then you've lost your goddamn mind and you are the enemy of everyone around you

i acknowledged that just because someone uses a title, that doesn't automatically mean that their actions/policies are in alignment with that title

that's not the case with the nazis since their policies, just about all of them, were socialist policies, most or maybe all of which socialists are clamoring for today in america

a retort being thrown around is that some of the policies existed before the nazis... but so what? they still promoted and enforced those policies while they were in power so its a silly argument to make

Anyone can run for a political seat. Who cares? It only matters if the fringe candidate wins.

Nazis were not left or right, they were somewhere in the middle. Thats it and shouldn´t be that hard to understand.

I watched some of those videos etc. and she doesn´t seem to be openly racist, but definetely seems to be leaning that way.

"How was their immigration policy?  "

sure depending on your perspective you could argue that this is a right leaning policiy

but, are you equating socialism with international socialism? seems to me like you are, as far as i know socialism generally is a concept that is bound to a particular community

to extent it beyond that is moving into international socialism

do socialists want open borders? i'm not so sure on that one... if they do then it makes their ideology even more stupid for obvious reasons

"Wasn't military adventurism a core tenet?"

many socialists would argue that violence is a core part of socialism... necessary to seize the means of production for control by workers/the state

"Nationalism was also pretty central."

i don't necessarily see a contradiction between nationalism and socialism

nationalism is the emphasis on the importance of the state... socialism is the means of transferring control of the means of production to the state

"They outlawed the Social Democratic Party and even sent leaders to their deaths."

i didn't argue that socialists are loyal people but regardless people persecuting people with a similar ideology is not something that is unheard of throughout history

when the soviets came to power there was much conflict and murder between the people that came to power, which does not take away from the fact that they all were allies to begin with

i don't understand why people think that this is a point considering that you can observe this behavior over different situations through history

jeez just the other day feminists fought to throw women out of jobs as grid girls while holding the banner as being the group in society to fight for women's freedom

" Basically, they bastardized the right and the left and using either political, economic or ideological side as ammo against the other because of some connection to the Nazis is ignorant."

as i have stated continuously, i consider the political affiliation of an entity to be determined by its policies/actions

when i look at socialised healthcare, government control over business, extensive child care services, state funded education, gun control and on and on and on

the vast majority of their policies are the same policies that dominate socialist talking points of today and that is where my conclusion is coming from