EricHiggin on 30 October 2020
Replicant said:
EricHiggin said: Unless it's some kind of super rare hands off kinda deal where MS is more so just financially backing Bungie and reaping the multiplatform benefits, I have a really hard time seeing Bungie going back to MS.
I also don't necessarily see them joining SNY either, though I'd think that would be more likely than MS based on their PS4 relationship.
Wasn't Destiny (2) the big showcase game for the Stadia launch? Bungie wouldn't dare be acquired by Google would they?
|
Bold: Hopefully not. Rather Microsoft than Google. With Microsoft I can at least play the games on my PC.
|
Same here, but they did decide Activision was a worthy partner, so. Hopefully they've learned from that. Maybe Activision was horrible enough that MS seems not so bad anymore, who knows?
Replicant said:
|
hinch said: Leaked footage from PS5's UI to game, and load time. Dat load time from menu to in-game in Spiderman: Miles Morales :o
https://imgur.com/ojMm3pa
|
Holy shit 
|
hinch said:
Yeah, its insane under 2 seconds loading from main menu. Bodes well in future games, no more waiting around!
We finally back to cartridge load times 
|
I was really hoping they would back off on the max potential TF a bit and focus on I/O instead, as they have. PS5 got the need for speed!
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.