they could get any other food in there he did not do a total denial of service, your point is invalid

I genuinely don't understand this kind of reply.

it does not matter that the baker could have given them the keys to the universe itself.

The point is a modern society treats everybody to the same rights. A straight couple would NOT have been denied a wedding cake.

the second a gay couple is denied their cake, they are not treated the same and the very basic principle of equality collapses.

If a straight couple does not have to walk away and look for another bakery why should a gay couple do?

You want to send the gay couple out looking for a different bakery, fine but that is not equality and that means all citizens are not treated equally and that is the issue here.

Capitalism is basically very simple: You want something you pay it with money WHOEVER you are. There is no need for a paradigm shift where you must add: you want something you pay it with money IF you are straight, if you're gay then money won't be enough, you'll have to be judged too and potentially turned down.

How some people do not understand these fundamental concepts boggles my mind. My point is very valid and very clear.

EDIT: No wonder that you guys had slavery as a legal thing for so long, no wonder some people even today can't treat black people like the human beings they are.

Let me ask you something - do you think an organisation like Mensa is discriminating against people? 

Because they won't let you be a member just because you have the money to pay their yearly fee. Is that discrimination?

Didn't know Mensa, I just googled it and apparently it's some group that only accepts people with a high IQ. some kind of elite think tank.

First congrats, finally someone who asks me a really tricky question regarding this issue. I can smell the trap you're laying for me, but it's a smart trap so I respect that

Well one could argue that there is a case for discrimination here because they won't accept people under a certain IQ and IQ's like sexual orientation or skin color is not something we choose and what we don't choose should not be held against us...

On the other hand (and here is where I avoid your trap ) they discriminate EQUALLY everyone. Gays, Straights, Blacks, Whites, Jews etc. If you don't have the required IQ you cannot join and your sexual orientation or skin color is not taken into account. And since we live in a world where low IQ's or even average IQ's are not considered a social group or a minority that needs to be protected, I'd say Mensa does not really violate any rights, both human or constitutional.

They seem to be some kind of elite circle jerk that loves to pat each other on the back and feel superior or something like that

I'm not going to pretend to speak for all of Europe because I don't know. I know of a few countries that don't. For example this most recent anti-immigrant guy that just got locked up in the UK. That never would have happened here. That judge in UK locked his ass up and then threw a media blackout on it so it wouldn't be discussed. Because what, his country is falling apart and he's pissed? Welcome to the club lol. The UK doesn't have freedom of speech in their constitution.

That is the very essence of the freedom of speech and our constitutions are the law for our laws. If you believe in that sort of thing, law and justice instead of cosmic justice utopianism. The Human right to speak your mind without government persecution, basically. A free press is not designed to be partisan propaganda like it is now, they're supposed to be ruthless watchdogs that call facts out on corruption, free of government persecution (and our press used to be this way). You agree with the right to assemble right? The right to protest government action without fear of the firing squad? The right to practice your religion without the fear of the state forcing it's will on you. This is all in our very first amendment. The 2nd right is to arm yourself if that firing squad does come. Do you think this blissful equality you live in wasn't build on blood? My constitutional rights are my human rights etched in stone and the highest judges in the land have to respect that. That's all i'm pointing out, you can believe what you want lol. I can understand how the supreme court might confuse a European  with a parliamentary system though. Although Europeans are probably more educated about american law than americans are, which is sad.

His bakery is his private business, that is his church. He's not the cable guy denying you service because you are gay. He doesen't want to build a custom wedding cake for a gay wedding and he didn't want to cater it. That's how it had to do with the religion and he didn't want to do it. Who cares? Go somewhere else. The State punished him for not doing it, that's unconstitutional. It violates his first amendment rights. I don't believe there is a human right for cake.

I wasn't there of course, but an article that someone linked to in this thread says that this was indeed the case. I quote from the article (my own emphasis):

"Phillips’s attorneys pointed out that he even offered to provide other kinds of cakes, brownies, or cookies to Craig and Mullins — showing that the issue was not that the men are gay. But he did refuse all wedding cakes to the couple, including cakes that were made for other customers before and a “nondescript” cake "

Forget the cake, the cake is just the catalyst here of discrimination, the cake is not important. I never said there is a human right for cake, I said there is, or should be a human right that protects against discrimination so that you can thrive in society without fear of being segregated because of your skin color or sexual orientation.

As for the UK thing, his name is Tommy Robinson and yeah that sucks big time. I am against Brexit but that kind of UK can leave the EU, I don't really want it in.

You say your constitution would have protected him? Well that would be a case where your constitution would be a very positive thing. I don't know all the details of the events surrounding Tommy Robinson's case but I heard he got imprisoned over his opinions. I'm not sure what's going on in the UK but it's rather worrisome. And we must be vigilant over here in the EU, we can never say this would never happen here. I would think it wouldn't but I can never be sure of that.

I guess democracy means constant vigilance and distrust of the government who could be easily tempted into abusing their power.

Very smart cherry pick only the demand side from capitalism. The supply side has the option supply or not. This includes the option to supply whom they choose to. 

"You have to treat all customers looking for the same service the same."

which law states that?

What is the difference? Time? That would be a pretty bad definition of religion 🙂.