No if you want a example that would be likely with a movie theater it´d be something like the owner not showing Brokeback mountain when it released because he´s christian and doesnt support what the movie portrays. Your example is clearly something totally different it´s his bakery and he shouldn´t be forced into doing something for a cause he doesnt believe in. If you cant see the difference between your example and what actually happaned then there is no point argueing with you. Court ruled in favor of the baker and it was absolutely the right call to make. 

Oh it's his bakery so that's why he shouldn't be forced to do his job... The projectionist does not own the cinema so he should be forced to do his job, fuck his constitutional rights, they are for the baker because the constitution only applies to owners and bosses, that makes total sense, got it

In fact your example of the owner not showing Brokeback Mountain does not apply because people go to movie theaters to see movies that are ON, and nobody goes to a movie theater to ask to see a movie that is not on. People have always chosen from the movies available to that particular theater at the time they enter the place.

Whereas in a bakery you CAN order a cake, especially for a wedding. Nobody buys a pre-made cake for weddings, it's always a bespoke order and the order was refused not cause the ingredients are unavailable, it's cake, the stuff inside is totally available to the baker. It was refused cause of the cake's theme.

This is basic logic 101, I'm sure you are intelligent enough to understand this and if not then I'll have to agree with you that there is no point in further arguing this.

Your logic isnt basic logic. One guy is refusing to do his service (His art if you will) for a event he doesnt support the other one just refuses to do his job. Its his bakery he can do what he wants he owns the damn place you cant force someone to do something they dont want to do when they are the boss around. He declined because of his believe its his right to. A projectionist doesnt own the theater if he does then he shouldnt charge people first to come in to watch the movie should he? Your example is idiotic and doesnt prove your point in the slightest. The argument you´re making doesnt make sense there are so many flaws in your example its stupid. The baker didnt accept the money and went like ´nah fam lmao not doing it´ which is what your example would be like. The projectionst can simply refuse to screen the movie at work. Im sure the boss can get him in another showing to do a different film and get someone else to do Brokeback Mountain (Im stll using brokeback mountain as an example) for that screening. 

If you cant see a difference between your example and the event that happened there isn´t anything to discuss. 

Then stop discussing, you are so shut down to logic that any further discussion is now obviously impossible. You totally apply double standards, one can refuse cause he's the owner, the other can't cause he's an employee. The issue here was NEVER the rights of an owner vs the rights of an employee, the issue what the constitutional rights of an AMERICAN CITIZEN. So yeah I'm done with you on this issue. Cheers dude.

So throw the baker in jail for rejecting to create an expressing of homosexual approval?

I would normally not reply to this type of rejoinder but I can't help but ask you this question:

Why do you think baking a damn cake would mean the baker has to approve of what is the customer's PERSONAL LIFE?

If you work in a sex shop you will have straight customers that will purchase vaginas and gays that will purchase butt-plugs or dildos. Assuming you are straight, in what universe selling a butt-plug to a customer would make you gay or would mean that you approve gays? It's a customer that wants a butt-plug. What he will do with it is NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUSINESS. You are a clerk or owner of the shop, your job is to sell sex toys, NOT to judge those who buy it. No one is forcing you to sell those. If you don't wanna sell those cause you have a mental butt-plug stuck in your religious mind, sell shoes or insurances or whatever. DO NOT go work in a sex shop if you have religious reservation against one particular community. DO NOT work in a sex shop JUST to be able to tell a gay that you will NOT sell him his sex toy. What is so hard to understand here? It should be a non issue in any civilized country.

And to answer your question, no need to throw the baker in jail, a fine for discrimination should do. If the baker is a repeated offender make the fine bigger and bigger, end of story.

Like I said its an extreme your completely right in that regard. I´d much rather have it the baker just baked the cake but I do have respect for his beliefs and he shouldnt be forced into something he doesnt believe in. I have the same feelings if a gay baker had to make a cake for a Christian wedding where the couple was anti LGBT. Someones art should never be used for something they dont believe in. 

It's his company, he is not the employee, but the owner. That is the difference you fail to realise.

If the projectionist doesn't do his job in accordance to his beliefs, that's fine, he'll get fired for that as a consequence.

If an owner refuses to do it, it'll cost him money and buisiness.
Forcing a business to do a product/offer a service that the state wants is pretty much forced labour.

Its not double standards your dumbass example just doesnt apply in any way whats happening. You seem to ignore what I wrote at the end and only focus on the employee boss thing. You seem to be sensetive on the issue so im done with it anyway im not gonna argue with someone who cant consider both sides stories. Cheers.

This should have never even been a legal question. Of course he is allowed to be a bigot, and free to choose who he provides services to (as he is not working for the public or in service of the public). The guy has no problem selling cakes to marry dogs, so whatever conception he has of marriage is idiotic anyway. But he is free to choose and express his religious views and rights.