Im pointing out that you dont draw the same line....

Hell keep rol banned for all i care but get the other perpetrators aswell.

I frankly offended that you think this is just because of rol and not the bigger picture behind it.

I really hope that Talon does decide to come back eventually, but if he does not I think that instead of focusing on where we went wrong as a way to get at each other, we should use the past in order to ensure that we can learn from the mistakes of the past and build a better future. Unfortunately we're all a very stubborn bunch, and we have our own views of how we want things to be, so that generally makes compromise/resolution a difficult matter, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't try.

What happened to this forum? Why the redesign? :(

1.  "one actual valid point" I don't know what you personally consider "actual" or "valid", but I see more than one point: 
a.  There are issues with the site loading for a long time and not letting me, Ganoncrotch, access the site in a reasonable timeframe or in some cases at all. 
b.  When this issue happens when I am trying to post in the forums or send a PM, the content is lost. 
b-2.  Other sites have a function where when this sort of thing happens the content is recovered when I get back into the site.  I, Ganoncrotch, think that this is an extremely useful thing that you should implement. 
c.  The problem is bad enough that I, Ganoncrotch, formerly an enthusiastic forumgoer who may have recommended the site to people I know, can no longer do so in good conscience.  If my experience is at all representative then this is impacting the growth potential of the site. 
(This was all in Paragraph One.  I don't see the way he wrote is as particularly "combative" but given the context of being part of a longer much harsher post I can see how you with your blood up, so to speak, saw it that way.) 

Paragraph Two, in addition to the beta thing, had extra content that attempted to emphasize that he was not writing this post out of hate but concern for the site that he has enjoyed using for some time—the site which he is sad that he can no longer enjoyably use.  This may not be an "actual valid point" in terms of actionable complaints or suggestions, but it's certainly not combative either. 

2.  Fair enough. 

3.  You completely misread my post.  Sometimes I consider this my fault for being insufficiently clear but to be honest this time I think it's all on you.  I didn't say people have a RIGHT to shit on you.  I said that it is a fact that people who are really upset are sometimes going to yell at people even when it's counterproductive, even when the people in question are not normally complete monsters.  This is what I meant by "understandably".  You don't have to like it, and you don't have to take it lying down (contrary to what you apparently thought I was saying), but IMO you really ought to accept that it is a fact.  If you park your car under a tree then birds might poop on it.  (See how we came full circle there? )

Please read very carefully:  there is a difference between a thing being right and good, and a thing being true.  Do you understand the difference between these two states of being? 

Please look up the word "condone" in the dictionary.  There is no sense of the word as described in Webster's Third New International Dictionary that applies to how I felt about birds pooping on my car last week when I parked it under a tree. 

I am not saying you should accept it as in "it's okay that this is happening and nothing should be done about it and the people doing it are doing nothing wrong".  I'm saying you should accept it as in "this is happening, and it's predictable that this would happen, and it's extremely likely to happen in the future." 

P.S.  Do you cede that I was right about "more than one thing"?