Bandorr said:
Ranting and raving about things without information tends to be scope of conspiracy theories. Specially when you see comments like "how much did sony pay you" which you can find in the twitter thread. It was a game they weren't even trying to hit 60FPs, and were hoping to hit 720 in docked mode. The systems that could hit 1080p60FPS or higher aren't being delayed. Coincidence? Who knows - we don't have any information. So jumping in and blaming Bandai as if this was their plan all along to screw over Switch is just weird. Specially when there is a much likelier chance it is because the Switch, specially undocked, is underpowered. Lets discuss a possibility. Which do you prefer, May 25th on game that can't even hit 20 FPS docked, or Summer for a game hitting 30FPS perfectly. I much prefer the company delay a game and work on it, instead of trying to rush it out. |
We've seen loads of footage, the Switch version is a port running at a higher res. The PS4 and Xbone versions might be easier but they can't possibly be much easier since they have new assets and actual work being done beyond just porting a 7 year old game. We've even seen the most demanding area in the original game running at a stable framerate. The fact is the difference is the PS4 and Xbone version are being ported by the developers with the full backing of Bandai Namco and apparently even some other outside help. The Switch version was farmed out. And going by this delay, probably not given a large ammount of resources. The Switch is indeed markedly weaker than the PS4. But it eats the PS360 for breakfast. This port shouldnot be an issue.
And yeah Twitter is full of those kinds of accusations because Twitter is full of morons who can't filter themselves and encourages speaking without thinking.
It's not a conspiracy, it's Bandai not being assed to put in any significant resources.
