By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Switch Price Cut?

 

Should the Nintendo Switch get a price cut?

Yahoo! (Yes it should) 28 31.11%
 
D'oh, I missed! (It should not) 62 68.89%
 
Total:90
VGPolyglot said:
V-r0cK said:

loll yea there were tons of articles on it and I think Bestbuy had the deal too.

Here's one article I found:

https://mynintendonews.com/2013/07/31/wii-u-basic-is-199-at-walmart-canada-from-august-2nd/

Wii U released Nov 12, 2012.  Dropped to $199 on Aug 2, 2013.  Only took 9 months lol

I guess I must have missed out on that then

It's ok, its all in the past.  It's all about the Switch now :D  ...and lots of Wii U games are getting ported to Switch so anybody that missed out on Wii U wont be missing out for long.



Around the Network

Amiiibos=Profit. Labo=Profit. Classic Nintendo=Profit. Switch Accessories=Profit. Switch Carts=Profit. DL Games=Profit. Switch Consoles=Profit. If they have the capacity now for more consoles maybe instead of price cut, they could bundle in a game for the $300 and break even on that. But it really isn''t necessary...



super_etecoon said:
AlfredoTurkey said:
I think it should have been $199.99 from the get-go.

Your avatar is of a mascot of a failed hardware manufacturer and the Switch has outsold the Wii at its $299 pricepoint after an abysmal outing for the WiiU.  Yeah, it's safe to say you're not the best judge of these things.  In your world, Nintendo would be $1.5 Billion poorer.  Eh, at least they'd have your approval on their launch price, though.  Seems like a fair consolation.

The Genesis was the best selling 16-bit console in the US between 1991-1994 and Sonic was more popular than Mario during that time frame as well. Sega owned the US during the 16-bit era.

As for the the the $299.99 price point, there have only been two Nintendo consoles ever released at that price point. The NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube and Wii all launched lower than that. Only the Wii U launched at $299.99 and we all see how well that worked out. 

So, Switch is the first console in their entire fucking history that has sold well at that price point and you're telling ME I don't know what I'm talking about? If there's a mirror, go find it, have a good look and say to yourself... "I don't know my history but I will learn and never make this mistake again."

Oh, and in order for Nintendo to end up 1.5 billion poorer they would have had to sell the same amount of consoles at $100.00 less but... (ready for it?)... at $100.00 less? They'd have sold far more than the 15 million that they have. This means more games sold, which means more money earned, which means... overall? Yup, MORE profits. 



You won't get any sort of pricecut at least until the Switch get's it's first internal redesign imo, provided it keeps it's pace.

NVIDIA must be on redesigning the X1 right now, as apparently they want to lock hackers out at a hardware level. Plus a die shrink is probably due as well. That chip won't stay 20nm forever and most of NVIDIA has moved to 14 and 16nm processes, so keeping the 20nm process around for the X1 is just ineffecient. Even with all that I don't expect a price drop before 2019.

Maybe at some point we will see an X2 revision with better battery life and docked performance, but that will probably be a new model.



AlfredoTurkey said:

The Genesis was the best selling 16-bit console in the US between 1991-1994 and Sonic was more popular than Mario during that time frame as well. Sega owned the US during the 16-bit era.

Sonic more popular than Mario? Extremely debatable

Sega owning the U.S. during the 16bit era?? Also debatable and more than likely false. I'd love to see sales figures, could've sworn the pie was 55/45 or something along those lines.



Around the Network
Jumpin said:
maxleresistant said:

Can you read?

I said that they "really don't like to admit that there is a problem", not that they "never admit it".

Is it normal for video game companies to enjoy admitting there is a problem?

No, but other companies react faster. Nintendo is just burying their head in the sand until things get really bad.



PortisheadBiscuit said:
AlfredoTurkey said:

The Genesis was the best selling 16-bit console in the US between 1991-1994 and Sonic was more popular than Mario during that time frame as well. Sega owned the US during the 16-bit era.

Sonic more popular than Mario? Extremely debatable

Sega owning the U.S. during the 16bit era?? Also debatable and more than likely false. I'd love to see sales figures, could've sworn the pie was 55/45 or something along those lines.

Super Nintendo Entertainment System Nintendo 1990 49.10 million  

      [17]
Sega Genesis Sega 1988 30.75 million [note 4]



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_game_consoles



Rocketjay8 said:
PortisheadBiscuit said:

Sonic more popular than Mario? Extremely debatable

Sega owning the U.S. during the 16bit era?? Also debatable and more than likely false. I'd love to see sales figures, could've sworn the pie was 55/45 or something along those lines.

Super Nintendo Entertainment System Nintendo 1990 49.10 million  

      [17]
Sega Genesis Sega 1988 30.75 million [note 4]



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_game_consoles

I think he meant U.S. sales which were much closer but hardly an owning by Sega from my recollection.



AlfredoTurkey said:
super_etecoon said:

Your avatar is of a mascot of a failed hardware manufacturer and the Switch has outsold the Wii at its $299 pricepoint after an abysmal outing for the WiiU.  Yeah, it's safe to say you're not the best judge of these things.  In your world, Nintendo would be $1.5 Billion poorer.  Eh, at least they'd have your approval on their launch price, though.  Seems like a fair consolation.

 

As for the the the $299.99 price point, there have only been two Nintendo consoles ever released at that price point. The NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube and Wii all launched lower than that. Only the Wii U launched at $299.99 and we all see how well that worked out. 

So, Switch is the first console in their entire fucking history that has sold well at that price point and you're telling ME I don't know what I'm talking about? If there's a mirror, go find it, have a good look and say to yourself... "I don't know my history but I will learn and never make this mistake again."

Oh, and in order for Nintendo to end up 1.5 billion poorer they would have had to sell the same amount of consoles at $100.00 less but... (ready for it?)... at $100.00 less? They'd have sold far more than the 15 million that they have. This means more games sold, which means more money earned, which means... overall? Yup, MORE profits. 

Is inflation not a thing?

 

How would they sell far more than 15 million when they were supply constrained for most of the first year?

 

Hes right, you dont know what youre talking about.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

Switch price increase? I think it's time.