Sheesh, easy kid, easy! I see you're confused here, at least know what you're getting into next time you jump head long into a thread like this without reading first. Know your facts next, time, that's all I'm saying.

That game looks sweeet.

Of course I don't expect you to get banned, I know a certain mod has got your back. ;)

Could you please lock this anyway, its really gotten out of hand and there is no point in hoping it will ever get back on track with all these responses to bait newcomers into continuing the arguments.

I never said you did do anything, you need to calm down a bit.

But it's still an assumption that many people are likely to make, given the history of multiplat ps2/wii games. Most people aren't going to keep track of which developers made what for the wii/ps2.

And even if the assumption was ultimately faulty, an explanation was all that was necessary, not an attack and an accusation of trolling/flamebaiting.

you sure like to implicate that people are getting riled up and then trying to calm them down. sorry, but your posts aren't compelling enough to frustrate people.

that's not funny, or clever. no one is angry here, except maybe trestres.

i originally only responded to one post directly here, and that was trestres, and he DIDNT specify he was talking about wii graphics, so my post was correct all along.

why would ps3/360 owners be mad about the wii getting a game with good graphics in comparison to its other games? as if the wii hitting its potential this early is somehow a bad thing for them?

thats why i ASSUMED he was speaking about "good graphics" in reference to ALL graphics.

 Well, neither of us had to pay up. :P

Well there is no sense is letting things get out of hand, you can't fault me for trying to keep people from getting banned.

You then later said that you didn't think this game looked good for any console contradicting that.

I thought you said this game didn't have good graphics for any console?

contradicting what? I have said the entire time that this game has below average graphics for this gens graphics.

and the third quote was in reference to trestres's post, which is why you are clearly confused.

he said it was getting good graphics and this would piss off the ps3/360 owners, why would they be pissed off if a wii game was hitting its potential this early? 

BCNR and Onimusha this is your last warning. Drop the argument. That goes for everyone. If you continue this argument, you will be banned. The topic is the screens in question and the graphical quality of this game on the Wii.

On topic:

My opinion of this situation is that Nintendo Magazine was sent a screen packet for Sonic Unleashed that every other media source was sent, and this screen packet only included screens from the PS3 and 360 version. This isn't uncommon. Alone in the Dark was in the same situation when it was announced (though magazines were smart enough to not print them as Wii). My bet that the Wii screens won't be of this graphical quality was based on this idea.

That said, given that Sega is getting tons of money on the Wii, and that they already have a working engine in Sonic and the Secret Rings, this shouldn't be a PS2 port and should have good graphics by Wii standards.

Please guys can we get back on topic.

I'd firstly like readers to cast their mind back to F Zero GX. Anyone who's seen this game run in 480p and on a nice big wide screen TV will have no doubt that Sega has some talented people in the graphics department. (not sure about the details of the different teams though)

And while the screens do look very nice and a step above most things on the Wii i don't actually believe they are ps3/Xbox 360 level. A close look at the fourth pic from the first group shows a fairly low polygon count on some of the surfaces.