Thats a tough one. I would say they're nearly identical in terms of how well they've held up. If I had a gun to my head and absolutely had to pick I'd probably say Wind waker, as not only has it held up graphically, but technically speaking as well.

Both look great, but being biased with The Wind Waker, I think that game held better :p

Windwaker, although I prefer the original without the bloom and smooth lighting.

Okami HD looks good as well, yet didn't entice me to actually play it again. I only spend an hour on the HD version, raplayed Windwaker entirely.

It's hardware is more inline with 7th gen. It was out on the market during the 7th gen.
Ergo, it is lumped into the same era.

No it's an 8th gen system. Dreamcast launched a year before the comepition and so did 360. Famicom launched before Sega Master System and PCE launched before Genesis but all of these were still part of the generation their compeition launched in a year or so later. Power is irrelvant. It was an 8th gen system and only you lump it with 7th gen. Wii was Nintendo's 7th gen system. It's why Wii is considered the best selling system of that era. You're wrong and don't bring it up again in this topic as it's derailing.

WW HD looks a lot cleaner.

*Facepalm* I never said it wasn't an 8th gen system.

What does that have to do with the price of eggs in  China?

Power is relevant. I recognize the system is an 8th gen machine. I also recognize it's hardware is derived and similar to those of the 7th gen.

I'm not though. You just misinterpreted my statements and went on a tangent.

A console of the same era, doesn't equate to a console generation.

Okami by far.
Seen so many forms of cel shaded game but a brushstroke? Never seen one until the first time I played the beauty Okami on PS2, It was magical. Now in HD, it even more magical