Correct, this is why it is cheap to make game for Switch when most third party AAA games are port only. Since when i said Switch games are costing more? With Nintendo ability, their games never cost tens of millions to make while still get great quality, even GOTY. Some games from 7th gen which the costs are nothing compared to gen 8th are some AAA games here, as i said before, the biggest Nintendo game: Zelda only need to sell 2 mil to be a success, just show how good Nintendo is at managing the budget. Some games like Witcher 2 budget are nothing compared to 3, Uncharted 3 have the cost can't compared to 4, or Killzone 3 compared to Horizon are laughable. 

You didn't. You basically said games on Switch cost less than on PS4 because it is like a gen difference on the power... still that wouldn't explain why they are also a lot less expensive than gen 7.

Nintendo don't use a lot of the what makes the budget higher, it isn't mostly a matter of managing budget, it is not having VA, not using very high quality assets, photo-realistic look, etc.

Games on Switch are a lot less expensive than gen 7. I don't think any big AAA open world game in gen 7 can be considered successful with just only 2 mil units sold. Not high quality assets or photo-realistic look can be make up by art style and clever designs with suitable colors. VA? You seem to forget Xenoblade, FE Echoes and FE Warriors also have full VA, even BoTW have VA, Metroid Other M also have VA and CGI cutscenes.

So basically you are backstepping on your claim of Switch games being cheaper because the processing power is inferior to PS4/X1

Anyone with a brain already knew a handheld never can have the same power as PS4/Xbox 1 for now. Also,  processing power is inferior to others doesn't stop it from get some current AAA games. All Switch games are no way cost as much as PS4/Xbox 1 while required less power, graphic settings and resolutions. I think you should meet doctor to check your eyes and mental

resolution and power of Switch is higher than PS3 and X360 still its games cost a lot less to develop and don't use the same level of assets. You are back and forth on avoiding to accept that the reason for their low value production (Nintendo games) isn't only related to the processing power of their console but more on the philosophy of Nintendo.

Agree with you, Nintendo games = low value production, PS4 = high quality games such as Knack and The Order 1886 which can sell 10 mil each year unlike some shovelware like Odyssey or BoTW. Who need Bayonetta 3 when you have the newest DMC which just announced for smartphone in China?

What are you talking about? I didn't say anything about sales, but how much the game production cost. You were the one trying to make it look like Switch games cost less than PS4/X1 because the system is weaker, but then backtracked when put against X360 and PS3 that are weaker system but had games that costed more.

Exactly, because Nintendo is so cheap that their game cost is pretty much nothing compared to a fraction of PS360 games budget, their quality is the best. Anyone doesn't have it can't be called real gamer, those people don't deserve to play games. How dare BoTW is GOTY when it is just a rehash cash cow while Horizon cost a mountain more, just look at it's graphic is enough to call it is the godsend from heaven