By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

You didn't. You basically said games on Switch cost less than on PS4 because it is like a gen difference on the power... still that wouldn't explain why they are also a lot less expensive than gen 7.

Nintendo don't use a lot of the what makes the budget higher, it isn't mostly a matter of managing budget, it is not having VA, not using very high quality assets, photo-realistic look, etc.

Games on Switch are a lot less expensive than gen 7. I don't think any big AAA open world game in gen 7 can be considered successful with just only 2 mil units sold. Not high quality assets or photo-realistic look can be make up by art style and clever designs with suitable colors. VA? You seem to forget Xenoblade, FE Echoes and FE Warriors also have full VA, even BoTW have VA, Metroid Other M also have VA and CGI cutscenes.

So basically you are backstepping on your claim of Switch games being cheaper because the processing power is inferior to PS4/X1



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."