By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

So basically you are backstepping on your claim of Switch games being cheaper because the processing power is inferior to PS4/X1

Anyone with a brain already knew a handheld never can have the same power as PS4/Xbox 1 for now. Also,  processing power is inferior to others doesn't stop it from get some current AAA games. All Switch games are no way cost as much as PS4/Xbox 1 while required less power, graphic settings and resolutions. I think you should meet doctor to check your eyes and mental

resolution and power of Switch is higher than PS3 and X360 still its games cost a lot less to develop and don't use the same level of assets. You are back and forth on avoiding to accept that the reason for their low value production (Nintendo games) isn't only related to the processing power of their console but more on the philosophy of Nintendo.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."