By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

resolution and power of Switch is higher than PS3 and X360 still its games cost a lot less to develop and don't use the same level of assets. You are back and forth on avoiding to accept that the reason for their low value production (Nintendo games) isn't only related to the processing power of their console but more on the philosophy of Nintendo.

Agree with you, Nintendo games = low value production, PS4 = high quality games such as Knack and The Order 1886 which can sell 10 mil each year unlike some shovelware like Odyssey or BoTW. Who need Bayonetta 3 when you have the newest DMC which just announced for smartphone in China?

What are you talking about? I didn't say anything about sales, but how much the game production cost. You were the one trying to make it look like Switch games cost less than PS4/X1 because the system is weaker, but then backtracked when put against X360 and PS3 that are weaker system but had games that costed more.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."