Yes He and Me brought those games... for me you said you aren't talking about other consoles offering, for him you tried another failed argument... Seems like you accept internally that Nintendo games and 3rd party offerings on Nintendo are cheaper productions.

Since Switch require less power, resolution and very easy to make game for, isn't it obvious? And Nintendo games are cheaper than 3rd, OK, are you for real?

https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/olliebarder/2016/06/30/zelda-breath-of-the-wild-needs-to-sell-2-million-copies-to-break-even/&refURL=https://www.google.com.vn/&referrer=https://www.google.com.vn/

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/zelda-breath-of-the-wild-needs-to-sell-2-million-t/1100-6441358/

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2016-06-30-zelda-breath-of-the-wild-needs-to-sell-2m-copies-to-profit

https://www.gamnesia.com/news/the-legend-of-zelda-breath-of-the-wild-needs-to-sell-2-million-copies-to-ma

https://techraptor.net/content/zelda-breath-wild-needs-two-million-copies-sold-become-profitable

http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/06/29/zelda-breath-of-the-wild-needs-to-pass-2-million-in-sales

Again, we are talking about sales of third party games on Switch. Not me but the ones i replied brought Ratchet and Clank here, why don't you ask them instead? Also, a game with a budget over 2 mil of kickstarter and on more platforms (Mac/Linux) than SF is more expensive, OK

GTA V was made for the PS3/X360 console, same for CoD and several others, including Tomb Raider... still they costed much much more than Zelda or any other Nintendo game.

Exactly, Nintendo games including Zelda BoTW are a lot more cheaper than AAA and Switch is still at least 4-5 times weaker than PS4/Xbox 1 so cost more doesn't mean cost as much as PS4/Xbox 1 games

Still Switch is above PS360 in power but the cost of the development was much lower.... this is more on their philosophy than the power of the machine itself.

3,5 times stronger than PS360 and at least 4-5 times weaker than PS4/Xbox 1, the cost in 7th gen is nothing compared to 8th gen. You are serious thinking the cost for a Switch game which required less power and less resolution/fps is the same as PS4/Xbox1?

And you think Switch Nintendo games are costing more than the PS360?

http://metro.co.uk/2013/09/09/gta-5-is-biggest-budget-video-game-ever-at-265-million-3955201/

https://kotaku.com/how-much-does-it-cost-to-make-a-big-video-game-1501413649 (CoD MW)

https://www.engadget.com/2013/04/21/heavy-rain-cost-52-million-but-made-130-million-you-do-the-ma/

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/uncharted-sequel-costing-usd-20-million

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-01-17-tomb-raider-finally-achieved-profitability-by-the-end-of-last-year

Some games from gen 7th for which the costs are nothing compared to gen 8th as you said... so how much did Zelda and Mario for Switch costed?

Correct, this is why it is cheap to make game for Switch when most third party AAA games are port only. Since when i said Switch games are costing more? With Nintendo ability, their games never cost tens of millions to make while still get great quality, even GOTY. Some games from 7th gen which the costs are nothing compared to gen 8th are some AAA games here, as i said before, the biggest Nintendo game: Zelda only need to sell 2 mil to be a success, just show how good Nintendo is at managing the budget. Some games like Witcher 2 budget are nothing compared to 3, Uncharted 3 have the cost can't compared to 4, or Killzone 3 compared to Horizon are laughable. 

You didn't. You basically said games on Switch cost less than on PS4 because it is like a gen difference on the power... still that wouldn't explain why they are also a lot less expensive than gen 7.

Nintendo don't use a lot of the what makes the budget higher, it isn't mostly a matter of managing budget, it is not having VA, not using very high quality assets, photo-realistic look, etc.