By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

Still Switch is above PS360 in power but the cost of the development was much lower.... this is more on their philosophy than the power of the machine itself.

3,5 times stronger than PS360 and at least 4-5 times weaker than PS4/Xbox 1, the cost in 7th gen is nothing compared to 8th gen. You are serious thinking the cost for a Switch game which required less power and less resolution/fps is the same as PS4/Xbox1?

And you think Switch Nintendo games are costing more than the PS360?

http://metro.co.uk/2013/09/09/gta-5-is-biggest-budget-video-game-ever-at-265-million-3955201/

https://kotaku.com/how-much-does-it-cost-to-make-a-big-video-game-1501413649 (CoD MW)

https://www.engadget.com/2013/04/21/heavy-rain-cost-52-million-but-made-130-million-you-do-the-ma/

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/uncharted-sequel-costing-usd-20-million

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-01-17-tomb-raider-finally-achieved-profitability-by-the-end-of-last-year

Some games from gen 7th for which the costs are nothing compared to gen 8th as you said... so how much did Zelda and Mario for Switch costed?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."