HoangNhatAnh said:
Since Switch require less power, resolution and very easy to make game for, isn't it obvious? And Nintendo games are cheaper than 3rd, OK, are you for real? https://www.gamespot.com/articles/zelda-breath-of-the-wild-needs-to-sell-2-million-t/1100-6441358/ https://techraptor.net/content/zelda-breath-wild-needs-two-million-copies-sold-become-profitable http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/06/29/zelda-breath-of-the-wild-needs-to-pass-2-million-in-sales |
GTA V was made for the PS3/X360 console, same for CoD and several others, including Tomb Raider... still they costed much much more than Zelda or any other Nintendo game.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







