DonFerrari said:
I so much doesn't disappoint that even knew the evidence you were going to post, is that something right?
I'm not talking about MS having to kill off Halo, I said Bungie wanted to finish the story. MS didn't want, Bungie left and they put another studio to do it. And they on X1X are essentialy making yearly titles and milking it. May the dry it or will it keep steady? Who knows, but the balance is very delicate. Although while they keep making quality game the sales will probably keep coming.
^ Any company would have done the same with Halo and all companies are guilty for doing the same thing. You need to stop pointing fingers at one company for a industry wide practise.
Disney is certainly milking it, and they bought it for this purpose. I love Star Wars, and by that, I'm restricting to the original trilogy not the shenanigans. How many the Last Jedi will they decide to make?
Halo is definitely worth milking because its an amazing franchise just like Star Wars. As for your sentence, what do you even mean by "How many of the Last Jedi will they make? What does that even mean? Obviously one..
Errrr you know it doesn't really have any difference on the forcing between making a studio for it or making other do it right? Because if the studio made to do it want to do any other thing and can't they would be forced to do it. And I already gave you the example of coalition being made to do Gears and Lions being closed after being forced to just do Fable and you asked for examples but after receiving you excused then.
No the point is you don't understand the business model. Yes in theory they are forced to make this franchise however that's what there hired to do. A police officers job is to police, not paid to fight fires. Are you forced at your work to work for your company? Haha honestly man this is making me laugh.
None of Sony studios were build to do one franchise because that isn't how Sony operates, it is how MS operates. I even gave you the example of Sony buying MM for they to do LBP, still the company was then doing Dreams and another company done LBP3. That is similar to ND being bought for Crash but still have changed to major IPs 3 times.
Yes and I gave you an example of Mojang making other games and Rare is another.
I already gave you 2 examples, Bungie was bought and kept for Halo, release when they refused to keep making it, Coalition wasn't made for Gears but then were forced to it, Lions the same. Besides all the other studios MS funded and closed without releasing a single game.
MS sold Bungie to give them the freedom to make something else. If they were forced then MS would have forced them to make Halo 4 and not sold them off. So they weren't forced in the end, they were asked to make more Halo games and declined. Coalition have a contract to make a Gears Trilogy, that's not being forced to make Gears for there life. Lionhead Studios was what it is, a lost brand and closed. Do you actually think MS is the only company to close down devs? Honestly.
Shall I repeat that using the Mario character isn't the same as releasing a remaster, a collection, a sequel, etc one after the other? I haven't classified Halo Wars as milking the mainline Halo (although it's milking the franchise, because it isn't Master Chief Wars, it's Halo Wars). If you can't see any difference ok. Kkkkkkk you are joking right? There are plethora Dinasty Warriors skins, Hyrule Wars certainly isn't a Zelda spin-off unless you are willing to reach outside the galaxy.
This is the stupidest thing iv read today if I am reading this correctly. Mario and Rabbits and Hyrule Warriors fit the same list as Halo Wars, there spin off games not kameos. This is a prime example of milking franchises which we came to the terms Halo is as well. Mario releases a different game yearly and so does majority of Nintendo franchises. You need to start understanding that Halo is up there as one of the biggest franchises in the industry which will have similar treatment to other major franchises. Now you are counting remasters, shall you tell me how many Shadows of the Colossus and God of War Remasters they have made? 343 made MCC and Sony did the exact same thing shortly after with Uncharted NDC.. strange how you ignore others doing the very same thing.
This is a thread asking what if the game succeed. And the point I'm making and you want to consider as impossible is that MS is more likely to keep the dev doing that game if it is a major success than allow then to leave the franchise die... and you already said, if they let a successful franchise be finsihed they are dumb. You can't have it both ways.
Your idea of MS doing this is far form the truth however glad its your opinion. If anything MS will build a separate company to continue SoTs if its incredibly successful because that's how MS do it. I stated I would love Rare to support the game as long as they can because I am not desperate for new IPs, I am happy investing my time in a good game. However most likely Rare will go on to make other games after this while someone else takes over. Similar to how Iron Galaxy oversees Killer Instinct. That's how MS operate.
From reading all your replies, its clear you have a one sided opinion and set in your ways to have a negative response to anything MS do. Open your eyes up more and see what's happening around you first before throwing punches at a company doing no different than others out there.
|