Imagine the meltdowns if it turns out Xbox won lol.
Imagine the meltdowns if it turns out Xbox won lol.
CGI-Quality said:
They'd be huge, mainly because that isn't what's projected. |
It was projected for months..... Intill ps4 dropped its price to 199!

*Comes in and reads the consistent fighting in this thread*

CGI-Quality said:
Guys, deep breaths. |
We have settled it privately via PM. No worries.

| zorg1000 said: I cant believe we have people denying Call of Duty & FIFA are two of the biggest system sellers on PS4. My mind is blown right now. |
Anyone denying it? But to pretend games that are yearly are bigger pushers than a game that had over 100% attach ratio is even funnier.
tbone51 said:
Knack is by far ps4 biggest seller..
@don holy crap im not quoting you with that long ass post! I will say you dont need a crystal ball to see switch wont heavily decline next year lol |
Well, you must discuss his points instead of dismiss asking for crystal ball and then saying you don't need.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
It doesn't matter what is the final result, there will be meltdowns
DonFerrari said:
Anyone denying it? But to pretend games that are yearly are bigger pushers than a game that had over 100% attach ratio is even funnier. |
You just did lol
"They are important IP, but to say they were the reason for sales???"
2nd part of your post is 100% irrelevant to anything i have said, i never once brought up anything about Mario/Zelda being/not being system sellers.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.
zorg1000 said:
You just did lol "They are important IP, but to say they were the reason for sales???"
2nd part of your post is 100% irrelevant to anything i have said, i never once brought up anything about Mario/Zelda being/not being system sellers. |
Reason for sale, reason for the success of PS4. And why would someone decide to buy PS4 in 2017 because of Fifa 18 that prevented the person from buying it on all the previous years? That is the point about it being yearly

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
OTBWY said:
We have settled it privately via PM. No worries. |
But I have to know who won! You can't get me all riled up and then not finish! Don't tease me!
Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:
www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames
DonFerrari said:
Reason for sale, reason for the success of PS4. And why would someone decide to buy PS4 in 2017 because of Fifa 18 that prevented the person from buying it on all the previous years? That is the point about it being yearly |
Thats like asking why would somebody buy a 3DS in 2016 for Pokemon Sun/Moon when they could have in 2013-2014 when previous titles released.
Or why would somebody buy a PS2 in 2004 when San Andreas released when they could have in 2001/2002 when GTA3 or Vice City released.
Or why would somebody but an NES for Super Mario Bros 3 in 1990 when they could have in 1985-88 when the first 2 released.
Are we going to start questioning whether Sun/Moon, San Andreas or Super Mario 3 were system sellers?
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.