By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Donald Trump: How Do You Feel about Him Now? (Poll)

 

Last November,

I supported him and I still do - Americas 91 15.77%
 
I supported him and I now don't - Americas 16 2.77%
 
I supported him and I still do - Europe 37 6.41%
 
I supported him and I now don't - Europe 7 1.21%
 
I supported him and I still do - Asia 6 1.04%
 
I supported him and I now don't - Asia 1 0.17%
 
I supported him and I still do - RoW 15 2.60%
 
I supported him and I now don't - RoW 2 0.35%
 
I didn't support him and still don't. 373 64.64%
 
I didn't support him and now do. 29 5.03%
 
Total:577



PS1   - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.

PS2  - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.

PS3   - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.

PS4   - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.

PRO  -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.

PS5   - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.

PRO  -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.

Around the Network
EricHiggin said:
Machiavellian said:

Who was it that was blaming the Left as a barometer of Trump accomplishment.  You used it as some type of statement to make it appear no matter what Trump does the left will find fault.  The question to you would be why would Trump care what the left consider an accomplishment.  When has Trump ever cared about what the left consider as an  accomplishment.  He has always did what he believe his base wants, so your whole defense was a total straw man argument. 

Its as if you want someone to pity Trump.  No one pities a President.  Its one of the toughest jobs on the planet and if the person who seeks that Job isn't ready for constant bashing every president gets then maybe they should seek another job.

I don't know, who was it? It surely wasn't me, as I did not say Trump accomplished anything. Well will they? So far since he's become Prez that's been the overwhelming trend. Isn't that part of the reason why it's claimed that climate change is an immediate threat? Trends over time? I never said anything about Trump hating the left for what they deem as a accomplishment, I said it's a bold claim to say he doesn't care about the left. He cares about his daughter and she's known/seen as a liberal. 

It's as if I want fairness and equality, so often preached by the left. Yet the large majority of what's thrown at Trump is negative hate. Bashing the Prez for doing something stupid is one thing, but bashing him because of things such as his skin color, well, not sure how the left think the right will come to terms with them if they won't live by their own creed.

He brings the negativity upon himself by his actions. Possibly if he didn't conduct himself like a petulant child, people would have more respect for him regardless of their politcal views. 



EricHiggin said:

Nordham is a racist pro abortion pos. Shocked he is still in office.



SpokenTruth said:

Ladies and gentlemen, the president of the United States of America.

 

 

Cohen: Mr. Trump directed me to find a straw bidder to purchase a portrait of him that was being auctioned at an Art Hamptons Event. The objective was to ensure that his portrait, which was going to be auctioned last, would go for the highest price of any portrait that afternoon. The portrait was purchased by the fake bidder for $60,000. Mr. Trump directed the Trump Foundation, which is supposed to be a charitable organization, to repay the fake bidder, despite keeping the art for himself. Please see Exhibit 3B to my testimony. [Exhibit 3B is posted above.]

Is this illegal? If not then whats the problem with it besides the lie.



SpokenTruth said:

Ladies and gentlemen, the president of the United States of America.

Cohen: Mr. Trump directed me to find a straw bidder to purchase a portrait of him that was being auctioned at an Art Hamptons Event. The objective was to ensure that his portrait, which was going to be auctioned last, would go for the highest price of any portrait that afternoon. The portrait was purchased by the fake bidder for $60,000. Mr. Trump directed the Trump Foundation, which is supposed to be a charitable organization, to repay the fake bidder, despite keeping the art for himself. Please see Exhibit 3B to my testimony. [Exhibit 3B is posted above.]

:) Highly amusing. Also infuriating. This is so typical of him. He's pathetic. I want to shave his body. 



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

Around the Network
SpokenTruth said:
jason1637 said:

Is this illegal? If not then whats the problem with it besides the lie.

I'm not certain what the legality is in the state of New York for 501(3) organizations using allocated charity funds for bidding and rigging a private auction in favor of the organization itself.  Probably a lot of gray area there. 

But if not illegal, then the lies, the ego, the narcissism, the pure pettiness on display are testaments to his character.  If it were any other president, we'd be absolutely shocked....but here we are treating it like, "Oh, Trump...you silly rascal."

Did a quick google search and found out that they rigged it in a way that would not make it illegal. Meh its just a picture anyway.

Edit: It would be a felony if multiple parties were involved in the bidding but since they only hired one guy to do it for them it would not be considered one.

Yeah his character is for sure shady but we have had many shady Presidents in the past so it's really not anything new. 



jason1637 said:
 

Yeah his character is for sure shady but [we have had many shady Presidents in the past] so it's really not anything new. 

How many? And, do they compare with Mr Orange?

Last edited by deskpro2k3 - on 01 March 2019

deskpro2k3 said:
jason1637 said:

Yeah his character is for sure shady but [we have had many shady Presidents in the past] so it's really not anything new. 

How many? And, do they compare with Mr Orange?

Don't know a number off the dome but there has been quite a few Presidents that were shady. Idk if they compare to Mr. Orange (lol) some probably worse some probably not as bad.

I find it weird that we act like most of our Presidents we're top tier guys when in reality quite a few of them were not great people. 



Immersiveunreality said:
Superman4 said:

You mean like spending tax payer money to support illegals? Allow for the killing of babies after they are born? Give terrorist countries billions, sell Russia Uranium which allows them to not only build more nukes but takes away from our supply leaving us at a disadvantage? Allow for idiotic laws allowing for more than 2 genders and the ability to not put down what sex your baby is when its born? 

 

The Dems and liberals are true nut jobs. Its the policies and beliefs that have gone so radical that pushed me out of that party. You dont get criminals to stop doing crime by paying them just like you dont stop gun violence by taking away guns. Trump has already done more good for this country than any president for the past 20 years. The Dems are literally saying no to anything he says even when they have not only agreed with him in the recent past but have voted for things he is pushing now. They are the butt hurt kids that would rather starve than take food from someone they are mad at.

First bolded:After they are born? Can you eleborate or do you have a link to some information on that cause i find it hard to believe that would happen to healthy babies.

Second bolded: Every group has radical people in it,  to claim it mirrors to all of them is untrue and shuts down conversation.

Third bolded: You never fully stop anything but it might discourage people from using a gun and it might give them more time to overthink what they're about to do if it will be harder to own a gun in case of some mental breakdown shootings .

to reply to First bolded.

 

By definition (found on Wikipedia (so not MY interp. or any others):

A similar procedure after the fetus could potentially survive outside the womb is known as a "late termination of pregnancy" or less accurately as a "late term abortion"

                                                            ^why they are saying baby murder.

Late term and the new after term abortion IS in actuality INFANTICIDE. n Just because people feel like calling it something else; to make themselves feel better, does not change what it is.

My son was born after 5 months of pregnancy, he lived for 4 days, and had all his organs fingers and toes and responded to my voice.  He IS my son,  He HAD full life,  He WAS not a 'fetus' without life.

beyond that:  Unless the moderator deleted it,  He never called anyone a libtard.  That accusation came out of thin air.   I read through the extremely long post multiple times (not gonna repost that: too long) - can't remember who was who at this point.

 

Update on NK:  I'm glad Trump didn't rush to a deal.

Update on who I support:  I joined the Yang camp for 2020.  This is where my political concepts align at this time.
I am glad that Trump: signed a bill to improve the VA; said Common core was a disaster (did nothing yet; Betsy D. is an insult to all things on Earth, including the platapus)
I don't think he is worse than Obama, I don't think he's really all that better either.



CommandoII said:
Immersiveunreality said:

First bolded:After they are born? Can you eleborate or do you have a link to some information on that cause i find it hard to believe that would happen to healthy babies.

Second bolded: Every group has radical people in it,  to claim it mirrors to all of them is untrue and shuts down conversation.

Third bolded: You never fully stop anything but it might discourage people from using a gun and it might give them more time to overthink what they're about to do if it will be harder to own a gun in case of some mental breakdown shootings .

to reply to First bolded.

 

By definition (found on Wikipedia (so not MY interp. or any others):

A similar procedure after the fetus could potentially survive outside the womb is known as a "late termination of pregnancy" or less accurately as a "late term abortion"

                                                            ^why they are saying baby murder.

Late term and the new after term abortion IS in actuality INFANTICIDE. n Just because people feel like calling it something else; to make themselves feel better, does not change what it is.

My son was born after 5 months of pregnancy, he lived for 4 days, and had all his organs fingers and toes and responded to my voice.  He IS my son,  He HAD full life,  He WAS not a 'fetus' without life.

beyond that:  Unless the moderator deleted it,  He never called anyone a libtard.  That accusation came out of thin air.   I read through the extremely long post multiple times (not gonna repost that: too long) - can't remember who was who at this point.

 

Update on NK:  I'm glad Trump didn't rush to a deal.

Update on who I support:  I joined the Yang camp for 2020.  This is where my political concepts align at this time.
I am glad that Trump: signed a bill to improve the VA; said Common core was a disaster (did nothing yet; Betsy D. is an insult to all things on Earth, including the platapus)
I don't think he is worse than Obama, I don't think he's really all that better either.

I am sorry for your son and i wish you if you do not already have, a healthy child in future.

Ok yeah i get why they call it late term abortion(calling something openly infanticide would not give it practice a good image with the wider public) and why it is done to prevent further suffering in some cases.

 

Part of the wikipedia page:

 

As of 1998, among the 152 most populous countries, 54 either banned abortion entirely or permitted it only to save the life of the pregnant woman.[22]

In addition, 49 of the 152 most populous countries were without restriction as to reason, but 44 of these imposed limits after a particular gestational age:[22]

  • 12 weeks (Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cuba, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Georgia, Greece, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Rep., Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Mongolia, Norway, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Ukraine, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan)
  • 13 weeks (Italy)
  • 14 weeks (Austria, Cambodia, Germany, Hungary, and Romania)
  • 18 weeks (Sweden)
  • 22 weeks (North Macedonia)
  • 24 weeks (Singapore)
  • no limit (Canada, China, and North Korea)
  • viability (Netherlands and to some extent the United States)

In these countries, abortions after the general gestational age limit are allowed only under restricted circumstances, which include, depending on country, risk to the woman's life, physical or mental health, fetal malformation, cases where the pregnancy was the result of rape, or poor socio-economic conditions. For instance, in Italy, abortion is allowed on request up until 90 days, after which it is allowed only if the pregnancy or childbirth pose a threat to the woman’s life, a risk to physical health of the woman, a risk to mental health of the woman; if there is a risk of fetal malformation; or if the pregnancy is the result of rape or other sexual crime.[23] Denmark provides a wider range of reasons, including social and economic ones, which can be invoked by a woman who seeks an abortion after 12 weeks.[24] Abortions at such stages must in general be approved by a doctor or a special committee, unlike early abortions which are performed on demand. The ease with which the doctor or the committee allows a late term abortion varies significantly by country, and is often influenced by the social and religious views prevalent in that region.

Some countries, like Canada, China (Mainland only) and Vietnam have no legal limit on when an abortion can be performed.[22]

 

End.

 

 

So yeah its not like anyone can do this freely and its purpose is to avoid suffering,to be against it is to put life above suffering.

Anyway people that are highly against it should go have a look into a nursing home for the heavily handicapped,a lot of them just do not have a good life and are unhappy and lonely with their prolife parents never coming to visit.