Actually these pictures show a very tame protest compared to the ones you see in Europe,i do not know about the reality of these pics but they seem rather nice;)

I was in a protest one time and the crowd was full of people with big hammers, crowbars,bats,fireworks to burn out cars and trow into peoples houses,it was sickening because every shop or supermarket they walked by got looted and they even emptied cashregisters,burned cars,pulled police from motercycles to beat down.

And that is just a normal protest in Europe,like a warzone:p

White skincolour frightens them more than violence does.

All that focus on racism and they are afraid of white men peacefully protesting,meanwhile antifa behaves like a bunch of criminals in most of the places they appear but hey those arent all white so its fine:p

Those people did not do that, nice job villainizing everyone for the deeds of one individual.

Not sure if you understand what I stated.  I stated the only way he can move funds allocated by Congress is by using the NEA.  What part of my post stated differently.  The problem is that there is no minimum time frame that the house has to wait to end a NAE.  They can immediately vote to end the NAE as soon as he declare it.  The Senate has 15 days to vote on ending the NAE and 60 votes votes is not required only majority.

Who cares if Trump is some evil nazi or whatever.  I just believe he is an idiot thats it.  He is an opportunist who cares only for himself.  He has lived a life of a con man and nothing has changed.  6 bankruptcies states he probably isn't someone I want running a business let alone the government.  From the countless failed business, his gut is something I definitely do not want making decisions that effect my life.

I do not want Dems or Republicans having total majority but I do like things moving and not getting stalled like they were under Obama.  I happen to have liked the 2 years given to the Dems when Obama first entered office and the 2 years with Trump and the GOP.  You really cannot get a good understanding for each party unless they can actually pass some bills.  In both instances we get to see how each party works and get or not get things done.

My assessment of the situation between Pelosi and Schumer is that they are playing the long game and Trump gave it to them with his obsession with the wall.  He put himself into a corner where and allowed the Dems to have s strong front against him forcing him into options that on the surface appear tempting but long term will cause havok for the GOP in the near term and futurew

It wasn't meant as a rebuttle, but I definitely phrased it in a way that can be read as such. Apologies. I Know the GOP would help block him as 70% of Americans do not want a wall. The Judicial Branch could even slow him. At this point he is standing on something that less than 30% want right now.

They are playing the long game. Trump, unless he builds a wall, could lose if the right Republican challenged him in the primary. Which is why I think he is in a mode of panic. He isn't an idiot, idiots dont manipulate the system like he has.

I see your point about the majorities. After seeing both I wish that we could just take the best of each party and abandon their worst and most over reaching policies. 

Sorry for beingso aggressive politics frustrates me because neither party follows the Constitution very well. Well, we haven't in 60+ years.

I will be honest the list of extreme left policies from Democrats being championed and some passed are quite concerning to me. I really do not want them to have a super majority until they are humbled a little bit. Trump has emboldened them because its all but certain he will ruin the GOP's credibility.

Acts of non violence are not always inherently better than acts of violence. A "peaceful" white supremacist rally may not directly create violence but they are advocating for a system or society that would legalize violence or oppression with the threat of violence. A symbol does not hurt anyone but that doesn't change the fact that people have been hurt by the forces that symbol represents. 

For me as long as a group is not submitting to violence there is a possibility for discussion to be had and the hope some change minds or start having conflicting feelings about what drives them, if those same people keep secret meetings we wont be able to know their motivations or have a chance at discussion so it is inherently not such a bad thing they are at some protests in a passive way.

People behind that symbol has caused some of my forefathers to go to camps but these days it is stripped of its power and marginalized,at most it does offend yes.

Some people aren't worth talking to and even then that's assuming that they're willing to talk. We're talking about people that want the mass elimination of people they deem racially inferior, if someone is gone far enough into irrationality to think that's a good idea they're immune to rational discource. 

I have lived in Tennessee (24 years), Texas (1 year) and Mississippi (10 years). Generally most citizens of all races view the Confederate flag as a piece of cloth not worth acknowledging unless asked. For example, I drove across north MS twice a day for 1 year and I saw 4 Confederate flags. As a reference point I saw more Coexist bumper stickers.