AngryLittleAlchemist said:
What if I was being serious? |
Nah.
Last November, | |||
| I supported him and I still do - Americas | 91 | 15.77% | |
| I supported him and I now don't - Americas | 16 | 2.77% | |
| I supported him and I still do - Europe | 37 | 6.41% | |
| I supported him and I now don't - Europe | 7 | 1.21% | |
| I supported him and I still do - Asia | 6 | 1.04% | |
| I supported him and I now don't - Asia | 1 | 0.17% | |
| I supported him and I still do - RoW | 15 | 2.60% | |
| I supported him and I now don't - RoW | 2 | 0.35% | |
| I didn't support him and still don't. | 373 | 64.64% | |
| I didn't support him and now do. | 29 | 5.03% | |
| Total: | 577 | ||
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
What if I was being serious? |
Nah.
CrazyGamer2017 said:
What a nice fellow that you are. Do you lose it every time someone stands up to your PC spiel or are you making an exception for me? No need to reply, my question was rhetorical. We finally agree on something: To be done with each other. |
So you’re AGAIN taking what I said out of context...I said fuck you because you kept taking my other remark out of context and even more, tried to use it to play me out against others, who shared my opinion and opposed you, just like I did.
Your way of handling this discussion was not only disrespectful but you also refused to even acknowledge the clear points I made, so again....with the biggest smile imaginable, F U very much! There’s no sense in discussing with you or just wasting one more second of my time. You’re a hypocrite as can clearly be seen by everyone reading your comments.
You were clearly being racist or..xenophobic, if that word pleases you more, but now try to argue that you’re just being critical on Islam, when you were heavily generalising and offensive, no clearly hateful in your earlier comments!
But now I’m an overly sensitive “snowflake” I guess, with my PC Spiel. Now I’m PC, but earlier I was the opposite?! You’re a hypocrite. Free thinker you call yourself...?!. Free of thinking maybe.
Edit: Mods, if you feel this comment is too offensive, feel free to delete it. I believe it’s a perfectly reasonable response to what he was trying to do to me.
Last edited by Errorist76 - on 30 November 2017| SpokenTruth said: Uh, dude, if they didn't agree with it, they wouldn't be Nazi's. Don't confuse Germans with Nazi's. Nazi is slang for National Socialist. It was the ruling political party. You can't say there were Nazis that didn't support Hitler because then they wouldn't be members of the party anymore. Those who refused to abide by party politics were ousted from, the party of usually killed. That's not the same thing as Muslims not sanctioning terrorism. Nazi's by default of party killed 6 million Jews. Muslims by default of religion are not demanding convert or be killed as you claim. That is a radical few who want that. There was no radical few in the National Socialist party, that WAS the party. Members of the Nazi party who disagreed with their agenda were kicked out of the party...and usually killed. |
Not true, some people can support a political party and disagree with one of the leaders inside the party. Look no further than Trump and the republicans. Not sure some republicans would appreciate that you tell them they are not republicans cause they don't support Trump.
And this is very similar to what happens inside islam, just like you said nazi critics inside the party were killed and if you did not know in many muslim countries apostasy is punishable by death... But I already got into those details and now this is becoming redundant. You are applying double standards, criticizing one group's crimes while exonerating the other and the saddest part is that among the little group that attacked me in this thread you are by far the most reasonable one, the other idiots talked about racism when the issue is religion or downright insulted me cause this discussion is beyond their comprehension.
Point is I won't explain again what I already did so please don't shoot with old arguments I already debunked. I can do it again but we'll then both be busy replying to each other the rest of the evening, not sure that makes sense for you or me.
Did you see the video in my previous comment? In case you need the opinion of a freethinker INSIDE islam.
Errorist76 said:
When did the pope officially apologise for the KKK’s doings?! Or Anders Breivik’s for that matter?! (Just because you asked, you might actually remember him in Belgium) Again if you really think the majority of Islam support Daesh|ISIL you’re so so wrong. They’re the devil impersonate to them as well. I apologise for asking you for your friendship once, didn’t think you’d be such a racist bigot. Sadly very disappointed. |
Why the hell would the Pope have to speak out against KKK? For one the KKK member if Christian were mostly Protestent. Catholic church has a very small following in the South.
psn- tokila
add me, the more the merrier.
I didn't and don't support him at all. But I see Donald Trump as a symptom of many things which are wrong in the USA (and in the rest of the world), not as a cause. He's just a man that got voted in a position of power because the country is sick to it's core. If Hillary was elected, it would just have delayed the inevitable rise of populism.
It is kind of funny to see the smug Democrats flailing wildly though.
tokilamockingbrd said:
Why the hell would the Pope have to speak out against KKK? For one the KKK member if Christian were mostly Protestent. Catholic church has a very small following in the South. |
It was actually a rhetorical question. Of course he wouldn’t....I was trying to make the point why high positioned islamic officials don’t need to apologise for what terrorist do “in the name of Islam.” You’re actually supporting my point.


Where's the option for "don't support him but is a necessary evil to combat the even worse evil of SJWs, PC culture and globalism gone wild?"


"We hold these truths to be self-evident - All men and women created by the, go-you know - you know the thing!" - Joe Biden
| WolfpackN64 said: I didn't and don't support him at all. But I see Donald Trump as a symptom of many things which are wrong in the USA (and in the rest of the world), not as a cause. He's just a man that got voted in a position of power because the country is sick to it's core. If Hillary was elected, it would just have delayed the inevitable rise of populism. It is kind of funny to see the smug Democrats flailing wildly though. |
True, a lot of people voted for him because they were tired of the corruption and the elites treating them like they don't matter. Others voted for him cause they are tired of the PC snowflakes and SJW's. Others simply did not want Clinton and her spite for republicans. Of all the fails during her campaign I think the worst was when she called Trump voters a basket of deplorables. When someone starts calling someone else names it only shows they have no arguments left to focus on the real issues...
As for Trump he's more of an opportunist who realized there was something to gain from all this mess.
And about the wild flailing, that's what usually happens when a person who does not understand the situation or a group lose an argument. That and insults... 
Oh god, I've done it again. I've read too much of a political thread and now know what everybody thinks about Donald Trump. Luckily I have a formula to induce amnesia of recent events. Don't quote me or I'll have repeat the process.
- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."