| Ryng_Tolu said: Ok, let's be honest right there. some months or even weeks ago, this question was stupid for a lot of people. But right, it doesn't looks that mad, well to be honest it really can go either way. |
How exactly does this play out in your mind when weekly sales for the PS4 and switch initially took turns at being first place, with often there being not much in it in either direction, but now has settled with weekly sales being anywhere between 60 and 140k behind the ps4 per week...
Think about it, the switch is 55m+ behind, it would take the switch selling over a million per week and the PS4 selling 0, for a solid year just to break even, now step back and consider just how insane that situation would be, now extend that out to 4 years, it would take the switch selling 250k a week and the PS4 selling 0, FOR FOUR YEARS, to break even.
Be realistic man, cmon
The PS4 will have achieved in just 4 years what the 3ds, a much cheaper handheld, took 7 to do, those sales are not going to stop, even it they take a downturn year on year you're still talking 10+ mill a year, so if you take the 4 year cycle above and come up with a scenario where the PS4 was selling at it's current rate, in order to pass the PS4, which in 4 years time would break 100m, the switch would have to be outselling the PS4 by 452k a month, for the next 4 years, just to break even.
How in the hell do you propose the switch not only achieve that, but finish way ahead? and the worst part is all of this is on the relatively generous assumption that the PS4 is only currently 55m ahead, when in reality it's actually closer to 60
The only way this topic would be a valid question would have been if both consoles were currently within a few mill of each other and had both been on the market for roughly the same duration.
The switch isn't going to catch up, no matter how good it is, no matter if they drop the price of the console, or its games, or release thinner, cheaper versions, it just isnt going to happen, not unless you cobble together the sales of the switch with whatever replaces it, (as some do with DS and 3DS because it's the only option they have against the frankly rediculous sales of the PS2)
Put simply, yes the question still looks mad, if anything now we've more knowledge of the baseline for the switch, it's even MORE mad because you are making such an outlandish question while armed with MORE information than you could have done previously.
Last edited by NATO - on 15 November 2017
















