Ehhhhh no. A 1050 is on par with a 7850, a 1030 only equals the 7750 - which is weaker than the GPU in the Xbox ONE. The PS4 is actually in between 1050 and 1050 Ti in power.

Still, these are low level cards, so the point still stands, it's just not as dramatic as you make it out.

Damn.. future games gonna cost so much to develop

What has rare done that actually demands power or even uses it? You probably are not saying anything of the sort and im reading iinto it, but you putting rare and naughty dog together next to graphical expectation is a little bizzare to me.

That's why they were clever enough to upgrade it to a 1060. Just in time to be crushed by next year's midrange.

Oh no im just a big fan of both studio's, obviously naughty dog is pushing way more realism, but I've always followed both companies closely, just like I used to follow Bioware and stuff, there was no context except I always want to see new stuff from them.

The mistake you are making is that you are assuming that flops is all there is to GPU performance. You are highly mistaken.
We have been around this tree so many times JRPG, but you continue to use the same flops argument, which is hilariously bad.

You can have a GPU with less flops beat a GPU with more flops.

No. Especially at higher resolutions as the Ryzen's APU doesn't have the bandwidth.
Plus the Ryzen's GPU will not be running at maximum speed if the CPU is taxxed.

Nice shifting of goal posts to push it from power to graphics.
However... It doesn't stop the Geforce 1030 giving a Radeon 7850 a run for it's money.

Because what you have failed to do is create an equal and fair comparison, aka. Pit the Radeon 7850 against the 1030.

Tech moves fast, so in 2020 a ton of possibilities might open up on the mobile front, so it's hard to say.

Next gen we might see some hooks in the consoles software stack that might give Sony/Microsoft more control over things like rendering resolution so that games can scale upwards and downwards better, which will be important if the push for multiple products with differing performance continues.

I said "Gives a run for it's money". Not beat.

However... An overclocked Geforce 1030 can beat a Geforce 750 Ti.
Guess what the Geforce 750Ti gets near and even somtimes beats? You guessed it. The Radeon 7850.

Sources:
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-750-ti-review,3750-10.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gt-1030-2gb,5110-5.html

The Playstation 4 is low-end GPU hardware today. That's the reality of the situation, that's how tech moves, that's life.

Exactly.

This happens every console generation anyway.
The Xbox 360 and Playstation 3's GPU's ended up in the mid-range a year after release, low-end after 3 years.
The PC and technology in general stops for no one... And that is a good thing.

Might be low end, but in a console you knw it can do more than on a pc, so  the ps4 still beats the 1030. So ps4 is still better than the low end gpu. I mean you just saw the reply of the guy trying to use it with ACO. ran like 7th gen.

Doing a ps4 switch would be really challenging unless you were starting with an all new games library. You'd have to get ps4 level performance in handheld mode or else there would have to be a patch for each game that optimized the game to run in the low power mode. I doubt many devs would go back and spend the time downgrading their games for this mode and almost zero financial benefit.

Assassins Creed Origins. 900P. 30fps. Mostly medium.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znB3v6ZOmb4&feature=youtu.be&t=4m38s

That is on a crappy pentium dual-core (No hyper-threading) and only 8GB DDR4 2133mhz memory. - So expect gains with a more modern quad/hex/octo and a heftier overclock on the GPU and 16GB of faster ram.

The PS4 isn't a massive improvement over that. Ergo. It's low-end. (Note: I have never ONCE stated the 1030 is superior to the PS4, just that the 1030 will give it a run for it's money.) And flies in the face of your console optimisations giving you any sort of catastrophic advantage.

Also. A Geforce 1030 here costs $99 AUD.
The Playstation 4 is $400 AUD.

Still not true. Here's a better comparision, where you can see the breakdown of every graphical effect: http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GT-1030-vs-AMD-HD-7850/m283726vs2182 You can see that the 7850 is leading in every category by a large amount. That's not nearly enough to give it a run for it's money

Oh, and it also doesn't smash the Xbox ONE, it's actually almost exactly on par with that one: http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GT-1030-vs-AMD-HD-7770/m283726vsm7710

But yeah, they are low end nowadays, with the XBOX being soon overtaken by an APU (and the PS4 probably too, with the Intel/AMD cooperation chip they announced just yesterday - provided they manage to cool that one appropriately to reach the power it's build promises)